Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Aboudourib, Abderrahmane

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024GPR for Tree Roots Reconstruction under Heterogeneous Soil Conditionscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Serhir, Mohammed
1 / 2 shared
Lesselier, Dominique
1 / 22 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Serhir, Mohammed
  • Lesselier, Dominique
OrganizationsLocationPeople

booksection

GPR for Tree Roots Reconstruction under Heterogeneous Soil Conditions

  • Serhir, Mohammed
  • Lesselier, Dominique
  • Aboudourib, Abderrahmane
Abstract

In the present chapter, a processing framework for tree-root reconstruction under heterogeneous conditions using GPR is proposed and investigated. The core of this GPR data processing is based on the matched filter as a wave migration technique. Heterogeneous soil conditions then make GPR processing challenging. The framework has been tested considering a heterogeneous medium based on an FDTD electromagnetic simulation scenario. The SVD-based clutter removal approach has been chosen since it clearly outperforms other techniques and it offers flexibility in clutter reduction. There exist several solutions to reduce the effect of background noise, mean/median subtraction, high-pass filtering, shifted and scaled background removal and principal component analysis (PCA) approaches. The relative permittivity of the heterogeneous soil itself is inaccessible. But GPR is a delay-based detection technique where root depth is to be decided for a known relative permittivity of the media of propagation. So, during in situ GPR surveys, operators perform additional measurements in order to assess the soil's relative permittivity by empirical methods like borehole GPR, average envelope amplitude, frequency shift methods, or full-wave inversion techniques. Otherwise, methods using dedicated sensors are based on a soil moisture analysis. Indeed, using models such as Topp’s one, the measured soil moisture can be translated into a relative dielectric constant. However, alternatives do exist. Hyperbola fitting is a processing method that can be employed to extract information about the propagation medium. Yielding the relative permittivity of the heterogeneous soil based on GPR hyperbola parameters, the so-called randomized hough transform (RHT) is proposed. This method is efficient and semi-automatic. Tested with homogeneous soils (the soil permittivity being known), a good correlation between actual and estimated values is reached, which does substantiate its use. The GPR processing steps are illustrated by electromagnetic (EM) simulations in complex scenarios. A realistic dichotomous root prototype is tested using the FDTD open-source simulations environment gprMax software. Heterogeneous soils can be investigated by examining the effect of increasing soil moisture with parametric compositions (sandy and clay soils). To provide experimental insight, controlled laboratory experiments using an in-house bi-static GPR system are then run for a simplified 3D root structure reconstruction from GPR data.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • dielectric constant
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy