Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wang, Lisheng

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024A Systematic Comparison Study of Different Bonding Technologies for Large Substrate Attachment of Power Electronicscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hueting, Raymond
1 / 11 shared
Rietveld, Gert
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hueting, Raymond
  • Rietveld, Gert
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A Systematic Comparison Study of Different Bonding Technologies for Large Substrate Attachment of Power Electronics

  • Hueting, Raymond
  • Rietveld, Gert
  • Wang, Lisheng
Abstract

<p>Solder joints, silver (Ag) sintering, and transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding are widely used bonding technologies for packaging power modules. Each technology has advantages and limitations regarding reliability, thermal conductance and cost. So far, these technologies have not been systematically compared, and in this work we aim to fill this gap. To this end, we have performed shear strength tests on different solder, sintered Ag and TLP joint samples as a function of aging via thermal cycling and high-temperature storage tests. The joint microstructure and failure modes were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results of our study show that sintered Ag has the maximum shear strength both before and after aging of around 70 MPa, while solder joints have the lowest shear strength that decreases from 50 MPa to about 35 MPa after thermal cycling and aging. For TLP bonding, the shear strength remains essentially stable at about 50 MPa after aging due to intermetallic compound growth. TLP bonding thus has a higher reliability than solder joints and is a cost-effective bonding alternative to Ag sintering.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • silver
  • strength
  • aging
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • intermetallic
  • liquid phase
  • sintering
  • aging