Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Zawodzinski, T. A., Jr.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 8
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2002Porosimetric study of catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells.citations
  • 2001EFFECTS OF FUEL IMPURITIES ON PEM FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE.citations
  • 2001Direct methanol fuel cell performance using sulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone) random copolymers as electrolytes.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wilson, K. V.
1 / 1 shared
Xie, J.
1 / 10 shared
Uribe, F. A.
1 / 1 shared
Mcgrath, James E.
1 / 2 shared
Pivovar, B. S.
1 / 1 shared
Zelenay, P.
1 / 1 shared
Hickner, M.
1 / 1 shared
Wang, F.
1 / 48 shared
Chart of publication period
2002
2001

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wilson, K. V.
  • Xie, J.
  • Uribe, F. A.
  • Mcgrath, James E.
  • Pivovar, B. S.
  • Zelenay, P.
  • Hickner, M.
  • Wang, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

EFFECTS OF FUEL IMPURITIES ON PEM FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE.

  • Zawodzinski, T. A., Jr.
  • Uribe, F. A.
Abstract

Power generation with polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), particularly those designed for domestic and transportation applications, will likely operate on hydrogen reformed from hydrocarbons. The primary sources of H{sub 2} can be methane (from natural gas), gasoline or diesel fuel. Unfortunately, the reforming process generates impurities that may negatively affect FC performance. The effects of CO impurity have received most of the attention. However, there are other impurities that also may be detrimental to FC: operation. Here we present the effects of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methane and ethylene. Two structural domains of the membrane and electrode assembly (MEA) are usually affected by the presence of a harmful impurity. First, the impurity may decrease the ionic conductivity in the catalyst layer or in the bulk membrane. Second, the impurity may chemisorb onto the anode catalyst surface, suppressing the catalyst activity for H{sub 2} oxidation. Catalyst poisoning by CO is the best known example of this kind of effect. Fuel reforming processes [1] generally involve the reaction of a fuel source with air. The simultaneous presence of N{sub 2} and H{sub 2} may generate NH{sub 3} in concentrations of 30 to 90 ppm [1]. The effect of NH{sub 3} on performance depends on the impurity concentration and the time of anode exposure [2]. Higher concentrations result in more rapid performance decreases. If the cell is exposed to ammonia for about 1 hour and then returned to neat H{sub 2}, it will recover its original performance very slowly (about 12 hrs). This behavior is quite different from that of CO, which can be quickly purged from the anode with pure H{sub 2}, resulting in complete performance restoration within a few minutes. Longer exposure times (e.g. >15 hrs) to ammonia result in severe and irreversible losses in performance. It seems that replacement of H{sup +} ions by NH{sub 4}{sup +} ions, first within the anode catalyst layer and then in the membrane, is the primary reason for cell current losses. H{sub 2}S also adversely affects FC performance. Figure 1 depicts the current density changes in a FC exposed to both 1 and 3 ppm H{sub 2}S while operating at a constant voltage of 0.5 V. As expected, the greater the contamination level the faster the current density drops. Eventually in each case the cell becomes totally disabled. The effect H{sub 2}S appears to be cumulative, because even sub-ppm H{sub 2}S levels will decrease the FC performance if the exposure is long enough. We have recorded slow current droppings to about 20% of the initial value after exposure to concentrations of H{sub 2}S of 200 parts per billion (10{sup 9}) for 650 hours. Exposure to higher concentrations of H{sub 2}S may bring catastrophic consequences. We have exposed cell anodes to H{sub 2}S burps of the order of 8 ppm, and observed that the current at 0.5 V dropped from 1.1 to 0.3 A cm{sup -2} in just few minutes. Figure 2 shows the effect of H{sub 2}S on cell polarization. Curves b and c in this figure were recorded after 4 and 21 hours of exposure to 1 ppm H{sub 2}S, respectively, while keeping the cell at a constant voltage of 0.5 V. Regardless impurity concentration and running time, replacing the contaminated fuel stream with pure H{sub 2} does not allow any recovery as observed with CO poisoning. Cyclic voltammmetry (CV) indicates that H{sub 2}S chemisorbs very strongly onto Pt catalyst surface and high voltages are required for full cleansing of the H{sub 2}S-poisoned active sites. After full anode poisoning with H{sub 2}S (curve c), the electrode was subjected to CV (up to 1.4 V) and then the polarization curve d (with neat H{sub 2}) was recorded. The complete cell performance recovery is apparent from this curve. A more extended discussion on H{sub 2}S catalyst poisoning and cleaning will be presented. We also tested methane (0.5 % by vol.) and ethylene (50 ppm) as potential fuel impurities and we found no effects on performance.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Hydrogen
  • current density
  • impurity concentration