Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vossoughi, M.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 50

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Shear bond strength of different tooth color restorative materials after using silver diamine fluoride in primary tooth dentin: An <i>in vitro</i> study.citations
  • 2013Tissue growth into three-dimensional composite scaffolds with controlled micro-features and nanotopographical surfaces50citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shafiei, F.
1 / 1 shared
Rafiee, A.
1 / 2 shared
Khosronia, M.
1 / 1 shared
Alizadeh, M.
1 / 3 shared
Simchi, A.
1 / 10 shared
Dunlop, J. W. C.
1 / 29 shared
Fratzl, Prof. Dr. Dr. H. C. Peter
1 / 569 shared
Bagheri, R.
1 / 4 shared
Tamjid, E.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shafiei, F.
  • Rafiee, A.
  • Khosronia, M.
  • Alizadeh, M.
  • Simchi, A.
  • Dunlop, J. W. C.
  • Fratzl, Prof. Dr. Dr. H. C. Peter
  • Bagheri, R.
  • Tamjid, E.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Shear bond strength of different tooth color restorative materials after using silver diamine fluoride in primary tooth dentin: An <i>in vitro</i> study.

  • Shafiei, F.
  • Rafiee, A.
  • Khosronia, M.
  • Alizadeh, M.
  • Vossoughi, M.
Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>The main disadvantage of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is its persistent dark coloring. The aim of this study was to cover this discoloration on affected primary tooth dentin with different materials and subsequently measure their shear bond strength (SBS).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In this <i>in vitro</i> study total of 60 primary teeth were demineralized and randomly divided into five groups (<i>n</i> = 12). The tooth surfaces were treated with 38% SDF, and restorative cylinders were built on the dentin as follows: (1) phosphoric acid etching + GLUMA Universal Adhesive (GUA; etch-and-rinse mode) + composite resin (CR); (2) GUA (self-etch mode) + CR; (3) resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI; Fuji II); (4) Surefil One (self-adhesive CR); and (5) TheraCem (self-adhesive resin cement) + CR. After restoration, the specimens were tested for SBS. Failure mode was determined by digital analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant difference <i>post hoc</i> test. <i>P</i> <0.05 indicated statistical significance.<h4>Results</h4>Group 1 had significantly higher mean SBS (<i>P</i> < 0.05) compared to Groups 2-5, while Group 5 had the least SBS (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mean SBS differences between Groups 2 and 3 were not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.328). Group 4 had lower mean SBS than Groups 1 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.17). Most groups showed adhesive failure.<h4>Conclusion</h4>CR associated with the universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode had much higher SBS than the other groups; therefore, we recommend it to cover the dark discoloration generated by SDF.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • silver
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • etching
  • resin