Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dr, Turpin

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020A quantitative and visual examination of sealed restorative specimens following exposure to artificial aging.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sr, Clark
1 / 1 shared
Bn, Hamilton
1 / 1 shared
Ae, Hill
1 / 2 shared
Br, Morrow
1 / 11 shared
Jg, Phebus
1 / 1 shared
Bm, Owens
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sr, Clark
  • Bn, Hamilton
  • Ae, Hill
  • Br, Morrow
  • Jg, Phebus
  • Bm, Owens
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A quantitative and visual examination of sealed restorative specimens following exposure to artificial aging.

  • Sr, Clark
  • Bn, Hamilton
  • Ae, Hill
  • Br, Morrow
  • Jg, Phebus
  • Bm, Owens
  • Dr, Turpin
Abstract

Low-viscosity polymer resins, or surface sealants (SSs), have been utilized as a means of finalizing the polishing step following the placement of composite resin restorations. The aim of this study was to measure the surface roughness (R<sub>a</sub>) of composite resins treated with different SSs before and after exposure to an accelerated artificial aging protocol. The study included 5 experimental groups of composite resin discs (TPH Spectra ST) treated with different SSs (PermaSeal, Embrace WetBond Seal-n-Shine, OptiGuard, BisCover LV, and DuraFinish) and a control group consisting of untreated discs (n = 6 per group). The discs were prepared by inserting composite resin in 10 × 1-mm rings, covering the ring and material with a transparent strip, compressing the assembly between glass slides, and polymerizing through the slides on each side for 40 seconds with an LED curing light. Each disc except for the control specimens received a coating of the selected SS followed by application of a transparent matrix strip and then light polymerization for 20 seconds using an LED light source. Surface roughness measurements were obtained with a digital contact profilometer at baseline (immediately after polymerization) and following exposure to a thermocycling regimen to simulate aging. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test with significance set at P < 0.05. There were no statistically significant differences among the groups at baseline. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline and post-thermocycling R<sub>a</sub> measurements except among the DuraFinish specimens, which were significantly rougher than all other groups after accelerated artificial aging. The use of SSs for the initial insertion and possibly for the long-term maintenance of composite resins could be minimally beneficial for restoration maintenance if a transparent covering medium is utilized during polymerization. However, due to the effects caused by formation of an oxygen-inhibited layer of unpolymerized monomers if a covering medium is not used, the results suggest the benefits do not offset the costs considering both gloss and R<sub>a</sub> surface-testing parameters.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Oxygen
  • glass
  • glass
  • composite
  • viscosity
  • aging
  • Surface roughness measurement
  • resin
  • aging
  • curing
  • polishing