Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ul-Haq, Ehshan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Friction Dynamics In Mechanical Bar Spreading For Unidirectional Thin-Ply Carbon Fibercitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yuksel, Onur
1 / 12 shared
Dransfeld, Clemens
1 / 32 shared
Hondekyn, Marie
1 / 1 shared
Caglar, Baris
1 / 32 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yuksel, Onur
  • Dransfeld, Clemens
  • Hondekyn, Marie
  • Caglar, Baris
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Friction Dynamics In Mechanical Bar Spreading For Unidirectional Thin-Ply Carbon Fiber

  • Ul-Haq, Ehshan
  • Yuksel, Onur
  • Dransfeld, Clemens
  • Hondekyn, Marie
  • Caglar, Baris
Abstract

Thin-ply carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) have claimed significant attention for their potential to surpass traditional composite materials in terms of performance metrics such as first-ply damage criteria, fatigue life, and ultimate strength. This study focuses on investigating the friction behavior of dry carbon fiber tow during mechanical bar spreading, a crucial process in the manufacturing of thinply CFRP. By systematically examining the interplay of wrap angle, tow pre-tension, and final tension, insights are provided into the frictional forces exerted on the carbon fibers. The study utilizes an experimental framework to analyze single-bar and multi-bar setups, considering both symmetric and asymmetric configurations. Results reveal non-linear friction behavior, with increasing wrap angles leading to decreased dynamic friction coefficients. Additionally, results seem to suggest that higher pretension reduces internal tow movement, thereby decreasing friction losses. Multi-bar setups exhibit distinct friction profiles compared to single-bar setups, especially for larger wrap angles and asymmetric cases, indicating the influence of superimposed wrap angles on friction. Recommendations for future research include further exploration of factors such as non-uniform normal loads and relaxation distances between spreader bars to enhance modeling accuracy and optimize friction performance.

Topics
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • composite