| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Quagliotti, Danilo
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2024Surface roughness of the parts produced by Tomographic Volumetric Printing (TVP) process
- 2019Modelling the filling behavior of micro structured plastic optical components
- 2018Multiscale dimensional tolerance specifications established on shrinkage assessment in ceramic micro injection moldingcitations
- 2018Manufacturing Signatures of Injection Molding and Injection Compression Molding for Micro-Structured Polymer Fresnel Lens Productioncitations
- 2018Evaluation of injection pressure as a process fingerprint for Injection and Injection Compression Molding of micro structured optical components
- 2017Replication assessment of surface texture at sub-micrometre scale
- 2017Multi Scale Micro and Nano Metrology for Advanced Precision Moulding Technologies
- 2016An international comparison of surface texture parameters quantification on polymer artefacts using optical instrumentscitations
- 2016Metrology of sub-micron structured polymer surfaces
- 2016Performance verification of focus variation and confocal microscopes measuring tilted ultra-fine surfaces
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Surface roughness of the parts produced by Tomographic Volumetric Printing (TVP) process
Abstract
Tomographic Volumetric Printing (TVP) presents a revolutionary approach to additive manufacturing, diverging from conventional layer-by-layer methods. This technique uses the principles derived from computed tomography (CT), utilizing three-dimensional volumetric data to simultaneously solidify the entire volume of the 3D object. The surface generation process in TVP calls for intricate control of the printing parameters based on the volumetric data. The printer interprets the three-dimensional information to selectively solidify or manipulate the material voxel by voxel at different locations within the volume. This dynamic process opens new possibilities for manufacturing highly complex and functional surfaces with varying textures, densities and functionalities. To find the capacity of the current state-of-the-art TVP process in terms of surface generation, we systematically examined the surface roughness of TV printed parts on various locations. Theobservations show that TVP can generate surfaces with sub-micrometer texture, thus significantly smoother than the surface produced by traditional layer-by-layer processing techniques. The analysis revealed a certain variability in the average roughness values across different faces and locations of the structure. The discussion in this presentation will revolve around the key findings from the surface analysis and how to minimize surface variations within the same part to improve the overall quality of TV printed samples.