Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hoflehner, Christian

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Modelling the hot deformation of a microalloyed steelcitations
  • 2022Physical upset butt welding simulation for high performance Q&T steelscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Meixner, Felix
1 / 4 shared
Sharifi, Saham Sadat
1 / 4 shared
Sommitsch, Christof
1 / 71 shared
Buzolin, Ricardo Henrique
1 / 54 shared
Poletti, Maria Cecilia
1 / 79 shared
Gontijo, Marina Melo
1 / 1 shared
Fritsche, Sebastian
1 / 8 shared
Enzinger, Norbert
1 / 96 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Meixner, Felix
  • Sharifi, Saham Sadat
  • Sommitsch, Christof
  • Buzolin, Ricardo Henrique
  • Poletti, Maria Cecilia
  • Gontijo, Marina Melo
  • Fritsche, Sebastian
  • Enzinger, Norbert
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Physical upset butt welding simulation for high performance Q&T steels

  • Hoflehner, Christian
  • Fritsche, Sebastian
  • Enzinger, Norbert
Abstract

High-performance Q&T steels are widely used for steel chains and therefore the chain joining process has to be taken into account in an early stage of development of new steel grades. To guarantee high availability and cost efficiency, a scheme for the physical welding simulation of the upset butt welding process was elaborated within this study by applying it to the Q&T steel 23MnNiCrMo5-2. By conducting thermo-mechanical simulations on the Gleeble® 3800 (Dynamic Systems Inc.) the influence of different process parameters on the joint performance could be determined. Furthermore, feasibility was shown for simulating the weld zone by conducting upset butt welding under controlled ambient influences by the use of the stated Gleeble® simulator. By establishing a suitable welding procedure with appropriate control parameters, high-quality joints with geometrical features and microstructure, comparable to the industrial welding process, could be observed.

Topics
  • microstructure
  • simulation
  • steel
  • joining