Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Fauvarque, Priscille

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 0

CEA Saclay

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Subcritical crack growth of SiO2-B2O3-Na2O amorphous phase separated glassescitations
  • 2024Does the crystallization of a zinc aluminosilicate glass influence its stress corrosion cracking behavior?citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Feng, Weiying
1 / 6 shared
Houizot, Patrick
2 / 40 shared
Chomat, Laure
2 / 5 shared
Rountree, Cindy, Lynn
2 / 8 shared
Célarié, Fabrice
2 / 21 shared
Bonamy, Daniel
2 / 20 shared
Ramírez Acosta, María Helena
1 / 1 shared
Raphael Rodrigues, Lorena
1 / 1 shared
Zanotto, Edgar Dutra
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Feng, Weiying
  • Houizot, Patrick
  • Chomat, Laure
  • Rountree, Cindy, Lynn
  • Célarié, Fabrice
  • Bonamy, Daniel
  • Ramírez Acosta, María Helena
  • Raphael Rodrigues, Lorena
  • Zanotto, Edgar Dutra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Subcritical crack growth of SiO2-B2O3-Na2O amorphous phase separated glasses

  • Feng, Weiying
  • Fauvarque, Priscille
  • Houizot, Patrick
  • Chomat, Laure
  • Rountree, Cindy, Lynn
  • Célarié, Fabrice
  • Bonamy, Daniel
Abstract

Oxide glasses, commonly used in everyday life, have a major drawback: they have a brittle behavior. In a vacuum, abrupt failure occurs when the stress intensity factor (K) is greater than the fracture toughness (Kc). When exposed to the environment, small pre-existing flaws can grow even under relatively moderate stresses. This sub-critical crack growth is also commonly referred to as stress corrosion cracking (SCC). Over the years, researchers have evidenced a clear dependence of crack velocity (v) as a function of K, with v depending on the temperature (T), relative humidity (RH) and chemical composition (CC) of the glass. Below the fracture toughness (Kc), three different regions have been identified, corresponding to different crack propagation mechanisms. Below a threshold limit, called the environmental limit, there is no crack propagation. In region I, the crack front velocity is controlled kinetically by the reaction between water and the stressed bonds at the crack tip [1]. Crack velocity (v) data follow Wiederhorn's exponential law with an apparent activation energy [2]. Data can also be fitted using Maugis power law. [3] Water diffuses towards the crack tip, and its time to reach the crack tip is the limiting factor in region II, leading to a plateau in the log⁡(v) vs. K curve. The crack velocity increases exponentially again with K in region III, which ends once Kc is reached [1].Several studies have been carried out on subcritical crack growth in oxide glasses, but this phenomenon is less known for phase-separated glasses [4]. Recently W. Feng et al. studied amorphous phase separated (APS) SiO2-B2O3-Na2O glasses [4][5]. The objective of this work was to understand the influence of glass structure (S) on fracture properties. For this purpose, pristine glasses were compared to glasses of the same composition that went through different annealing protocols. These annealing protocols triggered secondary phase separation, greater than the rings. The size of demixed zones increases proportionally with the cubic root of the annealing time. How this secondary structure plays on the environmental limit and region I was investigated.In our lab, we captured the v(T,H,CC,S) vs. K curves using double cleavage drilled compression (DCDC). Samples undergo SCC tests using a dual screw Deben machine in a well-controlled environment (T = 19 ± 1 ℃ ; RH = 40.0 ± 0.5 %). Crack growth is monitored by means of a tubular microscope and a LabVIEW program. Crack velocities (v) are obtained for region I and the environmental limit by post-processing images of the crack front position. Velocities correspond to a range between 10^-11 and 10^-5 m/s. To understand the link between the structure and fracture properties, additional tests were required. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was used for post-mortem analysis of the fracture surface of the DCDC samples to capture the secondary phase size. Optical observations, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Raman spectroscopies were also carried out to characterize the glass structure. The poster will concern these previous works and will highlight future endeavors.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • amorphous
  • phase
  • x-ray diffraction
  • atomic force microscopy
  • glass
  • glass
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • crack
  • mass spectrometry
  • chemical composition
  • annealing
  • activation
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy
  • fracture toughness
  • stress corrosion
  • appearance potential spectroscopy