Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Agrawal, P.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 17
  • 161

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Time-resolved evolution of the deformation mechanisms in a TRIP/TWIP Fe50Mn30Co10Cr10 high entropy during tensile loading probed with synchrotron X-ray diffraction19citations
  • 2024Role of TiB2 inoculation particles during welding of a AlCoCrFeNi high entropy alloy16citations
  • 2024Role of TiB$_2$ inoculation particles during welding of a AlCoCrFeNi high entropy alloy16citations
  • 2024Time-resolved evolution of the deformation mechanisms in a TRIP/TWIP Fe$_{50}$Mn$_{30}$Co$_{10}$Cr$_{10}$ high entropy during tensile loading probed with synchrotron X-ray diffraction19citations
  • 2022Gas tungsten arc welding of as-cast AlCoCrFeNi2.1 eutectic high entropy alloy91citations
  • 2020A Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of Sealing Potential and Marginal Adaptation of Different Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: An In Vitro study.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mishra, R. S.
4 / 5 shared
Schell, N.
5 / 220 shared
Lopes, J. G.
4 / 9 shared
Maawad, E.
2 / 31 shared
Oliveira, J. P.
3 / 45 shared
Shen, J.
5 / 14 shared
Candeias, A.
2 / 6 shared
Oliveira, Joao Pedro
2 / 10 shared
Lopes, Joao
1 / 5 shared
Mishhra, R. S.
1 / 1 shared
Rodrigues, T. A.
1 / 1 shared
Zeng, Z.
1 / 20 shared
Patri, G.
1 / 1 shared
Anushree, N.
1 / 1 shared
Jj, Kunjappu
1 / 1 shared
Sv, Shamsuddin
1 / 1 shared
Arora, S.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mishra, R. S.
  • Schell, N.
  • Lopes, J. G.
  • Maawad, E.
  • Oliveira, J. P.
  • Shen, J.
  • Candeias, A.
  • Oliveira, Joao Pedro
  • Lopes, Joao
  • Mishhra, R. S.
  • Rodrigues, T. A.
  • Zeng, Z.
  • Patri, G.
  • Anushree, N.
  • Jj, Kunjappu
  • Sv, Shamsuddin
  • Arora, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of Sealing Potential and Marginal Adaptation of Different Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: An In Vitro study.

  • Patri, G.
  • Anushree, N.
  • Jj, Kunjappu
  • Sv, Shamsuddin
  • Agrawal, P.
  • Arora, S.
Abstract

AIM:The present study aimed to evaluate the sealing potential and marginal adaptation of different root canal sealers to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of sixty human lower premolars of the permanent dentition that were extracted were used for this study. The visible debris and calculus were removed from the extracted teeth ultrasonically and were kept for 2 hours in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and stored in normal saline till next use. A low-speed diamond disc was used to section all the teeth samples at the cementoenamel junction. Later, cleaning and shaping of the canals was done. Based on the sealer used, the samples (each group consisting of 20 samples) were divided randomly into three groups: group I-bioceramic sealer, group II-resin-based sealer, group III-MTA-based sealer. All split samples were visualized under scanning electron microscope (SEM) at apical and coronal thirds of root canal, the marginal gap at root dentin and sealer interface were assessed. RESULTS:The highest marginal adaptation (5.60 ± 0.12) was demonstrated by EndoSequence BC sealer, followed immediately by ProRoot MTA sealer (4.48 ± 0.12) and EndoREZ sealer (2.10 ± 0.54). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was seen between the EndoSequence BC and ProRoot MTA sealer for apical and coronal marginal adaptation. Also, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between EndoSequence BC sealer vs EndoREZ sealer at coronal and EndoSequence BC sealer vs EndoREZ sealer and EndoREZ sealer vs ProRoot MTA sealer at apical third. CONCLUSION:The present study concluded that significant and better sealing ability and marginal adaptation was demonstrated by EndoSequence BC (bioceramic sealer) when compared to ProRoot MTA sealer (MTA-based sealer) and EndoREZ sealer (resin-based sealer). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:Numerous endodontic sealers enter the market with various factors to attain acceptable seal. According to current study bioceramic sealer, is the appropriate sealer that hermetically seals all the margins.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • Sodium
  • resin