Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lowe, Douglas

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Actionable workflows for fusion neutronics simulation.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Woolland, Oliver
1 / 2 shared
Miao, Zeyuan
1 / 1 shared
Margetts, Lee
1 / 10 shared
Barker, Adam
1 / 1 shared
Smith, William
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Woolland, Oliver
  • Miao, Zeyuan
  • Margetts, Lee
  • Barker, Adam
  • Smith, William
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Actionable workflows for fusion neutronics simulation.

  • Woolland, Oliver
  • Lowe, Douglas
  • Miao, Zeyuan
  • Margetts, Lee
  • Barker, Adam
  • Smith, William
Abstract

Neutronics simulations are complex and typically require significant effort in setting up multiple pre- and post-processing steps, such as preparing data and geometry before the neutronics simulation can be carried out. From the end user point of view, many complex tools must be mastered in order to run the simulations, creating a barrier of entry to a field that needs to transition from science to engineering. Different versions of the tools used and customisation of processing steps can also lead to reproducibility issues, and the data produced could often be better managed.<br/>We propose setting up standard packages (i.e. OpenMC and Paramak) as interoperable tools that can be linked up to create an automated simulation process, to be executed using a workflow engine (i.e. Galaxy). The integrated tools can then be (re)configured into scalable, actionable workflows that are FAIR; findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. The chosen workflow engine provides a simple and accessible interface with many added benefits, such as capturing metadata, documenting what simulation has been executed, when, by whom, how and why.The selected workflow engine also enables automatic scheduling on distributed and high performance computing systems.<br/>The presentation will use a spherical tokamak case study to show how this approach can be used to orchestrate neutronics simulations. The authors will first show how individual tools can be put together as automated workflows. By presenting the results of a neutronics simulation carried out in this way, the authors will then highlight the simplicity and added benefits of workflows.<br/>The work is aimed at the neutronics community but especially newcomers or those outside the community (such as SMEs or young researchers) who wish to run basic simulations but are unfamiliar with the tools used in the sector.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation