Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dorier, Matthieu

  • Google
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2020Pufferscale: Rescaling HPC Data Services for High Energy Physics Applications5citations
  • 2020How fast can one resize a distributed file system?1citations
  • 2018Pufferbench: Evaluating and Optimizing Malleability of Distributed Storage3citations
  • 2018A Lower Bound for the Commission Times in Replication-Based Distributed Storage Systemscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ross, Robert
1 / 2 shared
Wild, Stefan M.
1 / 1 shared
Leyffer, Sven
1 / 1 shared
Antoniu, Gabriel
4 / 5 shared
Cheriere, Nathanaël
2 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ross, Robert
  • Wild, Stefan M.
  • Leyffer, Sven
  • Antoniu, Gabriel
  • Cheriere, Nathanaël
OrganizationsLocationPeople

report

A Lower Bound for the Commission Times in Replication-Based Distributed Storage Systems

  • Dorier, Matthieu
  • Antoniu, Gabriel
  • Cheriere, Nathanaël
Abstract

Efficient resource utilization becomes a major concern as large-scale computing infrastructures such as supercomputers and clouds keep growing in size. Malleability, the possibility for resource managers to dynamically increase or decrease the amount of resources allocated to a job, is a promising way to save energy and cost.However, state-of-the-art parallel and distributed storage systems have not been designed with malleability in mind. The reason is mainly the supposedly high cost of data transfers required by resizing operations. Nevertheless, as network and storage technologies evolve, old assumptions about potential bottlenecks can be revisited.In this study, we model the duration of the commission operation, for which we obtain theoretical lower bounds. We then consider HDFS as a use case, and we show that our lower bound can be used to evaluate the performance of the commission algorithms. We show that the commission in HDFS can be greatly accelerated. With the highlights provided by our lower bound, we suggest improvements to speed the commission in HDFS.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy