Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yang, Yihui

  • Google
  • 2
  • 12
  • 8

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Machine Learning-Derived Correlations for Scale-Up and Technology Transfer of Primary Nucleation Kinetics.citations
  • 2023Machine learning derived correlations for scale-up and technology transfer of primary nucleation kinetics8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ter Horst, Joop H.
1 / 2 shared
Papageorgiou, Charles D.
2 / 2 shared
Houson, Ian Nicholas
1 / 1 shared
Florence, Alastair J.
1 / 3 shared
Yerdelen, Stephanie
2 / 3 shared
Mitchell, Chris
2 / 2 shared
Brown, Cameron J.
2 / 3 shared
Sefcik, Jan
2 / 10 shared
Quon, Justin L.
2 / 2 shared
Florence, Alastair
1 / 11 shared
Houson, Ian
1 / 1 shared
Ter Horst, Joop
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ter Horst, Joop H.
  • Papageorgiou, Charles D.
  • Houson, Ian Nicholas
  • Florence, Alastair J.
  • Yerdelen, Stephanie
  • Mitchell, Chris
  • Brown, Cameron J.
  • Sefcik, Jan
  • Quon, Justin L.
  • Florence, Alastair
  • Houson, Ian
  • Ter Horst, Joop
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Machine Learning-Derived Correlations for Scale-Up and Technology Transfer of Primary Nucleation Kinetics.

  • Ter Horst, Joop H.
  • Papageorgiou, Charles D.
  • Houson, Ian Nicholas
  • Florence, Alastair J.
  • Yerdelen, Stephanie
  • Mitchell, Chris
  • Brown, Cameron J.
  • Sefcik, Jan
  • Yang, Yihui
  • Quon, Justin L.
Abstract

Scaling up and technology transfer of crystallization processes have been and continue to be a challenge. This is often due to the stochastic nature of primary nucleation, various scale dependencies of nucleation mechanisms, and the multitude of scale-up approaches. To better understand these dependencies, a series of isothermal induction time studies were performed across a range of vessel volumes, impeller types, and impeller speeds. From these measurements, the nucleation rate and growth time were estimated as parameters of an induction time distribution model. Then using machine learning techniques, correlations between the vessel hydrodynamic features, calculated from computational flow dynamic simulations, and nucleation kinetic parameters were analyzed. Of the 18 machine learning models trained, two models for the nucleation rate were found to have the best performance (in terms of % of predictions within experimental variance): a nonlinear random Forest model and a nonlinear gradient boosting model. For growth time, a nonlinear gradient boosting model was found to outperform the other models tested. These models were then ensembled to directly predict the probability of nucleation, at a given time, solely from hydrodynamic features with an overall root mean square error of 0.16. This work shows how machine learning approaches can be used to analyze limited datasets of induction times to provide insights into what hydrodynamic parameters should be considered in the scale-up of an unseeded crystallization process.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • random
  • crystallization
  • machine learning