Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jozwik, Maciej

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Fairly and Rapidly Assessing Low Carbon Concrete Made with Slowly Reacting Cementscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Macphee, Donald
1 / 19 shared
Newlands, Moray
1 / 13 shared
Jones, Prof M. R.
1 / 29 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Macphee, Donald
  • Newlands, Moray
  • Jones, Prof M. R.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Fairly and Rapidly Assessing Low Carbon Concrete Made with Slowly Reacting Cements

  • Macphee, Donald
  • Newlands, Moray
  • Jozwik, Maciej
  • Jones, Prof M. R.
Abstract

The CIIIA+SR combination in BS 8500-1 accounts for around 40% of UK ready-mixed concrete production and will normally consist of 50%-55% GGBS. The slower setting times and strength gain, especially at lower ambient temperatures, can cause issues with finishing due to extended bleed and programming due to extended stripping times. Contractors have become accustomed to these challenges, however the performance of the lower clinker cements in EN 197-5 will present an even bigger challenge compared to their binary equivalents. Low carbon alternatives typically require anywhere between 90 and 180 days of standard water curing to reach equivalent standard 28-day concrete maturity. Whilst this has significant implications for programming of construction work, it is also difficult to make material performance comparisons within timescales suitable for clients and designers to make decisions on material specification.<br/>A range of cement type combinations were cast using typical w/c ratio used for structural and non structural concrete (0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 w/c). Elevated temperature curing regime (at 50°C) was investigated by means of comparative performance against standard water cured samples. Analysis involved comparison of compressive strength development to establish strength-based equivalent maturity. MIP and SEM were done to investigate both porosity and physical microstructure of test specimens.<br/>Compressive strength equivalency was used as a proxy for equivalent degree of maturity of investigated concrete compositions. The research shows that 21-day elevated temperature cured samples are very similar to 90-day standard cured specimens in terms of both compressive strength and internal physical microstructure. The similarities diverge with increasing water-cement ratio with little compressive strength equivalency for concretes cast at 0.6 w/c. However, the microstructure remains similar suggesting equal degree of maturity for both elevated and standard cured samples of corresponding cement type concretes for all investigated water-cement ratios.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • strength
  • cement
  • porosity
  • curing