Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brattico, Elvira

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

Aarhus University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Perceptual processing of a complex musical contextcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Højlund, Andreas
1 / 1 shared
Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
1 / 1 shared
Hansen, Niels Chr.
1 / 1 shared
Vuust, Peter
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Højlund, Andreas
  • Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
  • Hansen, Niels Chr.
  • Vuust, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Perceptual processing of a complex musical context

  • Højlund, Andreas
  • Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
  • Brattico, Elvira
  • Hansen, Niels Chr.
  • Vuust, Peter
Abstract

Background: One striking property of the human auditory system is its capacity to transform a simple acoustic wave into a complex percept such as music. While the exact mechanisms of this process are unknown, the evidence suggests that the formulation, violation and update of auditory predictions play a fundamental role in music perception. The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a brain response that offers a unique insight into these processes. The MMN is elicited by deviants in a series of repetitive sounds and reflects the perception of change in physical and abstract sound regularities. Therefore, it is regarded as a prediction error signal and a neural correlate of the updating of predictive perceptual models. In music, the MMN has been particularly valuable for the assessment of musical expectations, learning and expertise. However, the MMN paradigm has an important limitation: its ecological validity. Most studies use single tones or simple pitch patterns as stimuli failing to represent the complexity of everyday music. This is important since music perception is highly dependent on the statistical regularities of often hugely varying sound contexts. Furthermore, different types of listeners (e.g., jazz vs. classical musicians) might perceive different aspects and types of music in different ways. These nuances are very difficult to capture with current paradigms. Aims: Our main goal is to determine if it is possible to record MMNs in a more ecologically valid and complex musical context. To this aim we will develop a new paradigm using more real-sounding stimuli. Our stimuli will be two-part music excerpts made by adding a melody to a previous design based on the Alberti bass (Vuust et al., 2011). Our second goal is to determine how the complexity of this context affects the predictive processes indexed by the MMN. We will achieve this in two stages. First, we want to establish how the pitch complexity of the melody affects predictions for different features. Thus, we will compare the melody and the bass when presented separately. Second, we want to determine how presenting the melody and the bass together affects MMN responses. To this purpose we will compare the two-part excerpts with the melody and the bass presented individually. Method: We will measure non-musicians responses to deviants (tuning, intensity, timbre and slide) embedded in two-part music while they watch a silent movie. Stimuli will consist of several melodies placed on top of the Alberti bass used previously. The musical excerpts will be randomly transposed to several keys. There will be four different blocks: melody alone, bass alone, melody and bass together and bass in the pitch range of the melody. This last block will be added to control for pitch height confounds. We will use Magnetoencephalography to record MMNs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to aid source localization. Results: We expect MMNs for all features in all blocks. For the comparison between the melody and the bass, we hypothesize reduced -but still present- MMNs in the melody for pitch related features (tuning, slide). This is because the melody’s pitch complexity is higher and its pitch predictability is lower, which makes pitch related deviants less surprising. Regarding the two-part excerpts, previous studies suggested a reduction of MMN when several streams are heard simultaneously. This might be due to competition for neural resources. In consequence, we expect reduced MMNs in this condition compared to the bass and the melody presented separately.Conclusions: Our study can open the door for testing auditory perception in more realsounding and complex musical contexts. It may lay the ground for the research of more fine-grained questions with different types of listeners such as particular kinds of musicians and cochlear implant users. We hope our efforts promote the interest in the use of more realistic stimuli in music research.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy