Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ogunsemi, B.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016Effects of component stand-off height on reliability of solder joints in assembled electronic componentcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Njoku, Jude E.
1 / 3 shared
Bhatti, Raj
1 / 2 shared
Mallik, Sabuj
1 / 10 shared
Amalu, Dr Emeka
1 / 19 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Njoku, Jude E.
  • Bhatti, Raj
  • Mallik, Sabuj
  • Amalu, Dr Emeka
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Effects of component stand-off height on reliability of solder joints in assembled electronic component

  • Njoku, Jude E.
  • Bhatti, Raj
  • Mallik, Sabuj
  • Amalu, Dr Emeka
  • Ogunsemi, B.
Abstract

<p>The structural performance of electronic devices depends immensely on the standoff height of the components used to assemble them. The component standoff height (CSH) of electronic assemblies can be varied either by changing the settings of the reflow profile parameters or by varying the diameter of bond pad on the printed circuit board (PCB). The continued desire by electronic manufacturing industries to improve the reliability of their devices has driven researchers to seek in-depth understanding of the contribution of CSH on the integrity of solder joints in these assemblies. This is coupled with the fact that there is no industry standard for CSH, for electronic components. This investigation studies the effect of CSH on the shear strength and failure mechanism of assembled Ball Grid Array (BGA) electronic components. Five different CSHs were investigated using a number of test vehicles. The various CSHs were achieved by varying the bond pads on the PCB while keeping the reflow profile parameters constant. These test vehicles were subjected to shear stress using a Dage 4000 series bond tester. The results obtained demonstrate that the different vehicles produce different load profiles and their shear strength increases with decrease in their CSH. It was found that the mechanics of failure of the specimen is both by crack propagation at the interface between solder bulk and the intermetallic layer; and by pad lifting. These findings would be useful to benchmark the CHS for B GAs, for their optimal mechanical reliability.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • intermetallic