Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gao, Jinglong

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Residual strength based on CPT sleeve friction and a constant volume ring shear devicecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Oloughlin, Conleth
1 / 5 shared
Wang, Yufei
1 / 1 shared
Fourie, Andy
1 / 13 shared
Mmbando, Erwin
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Oloughlin, Conleth
  • Wang, Yufei
  • Fourie, Andy
  • Mmbando, Erwin
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Residual strength based on CPT sleeve friction and a constant volume ring shear device

  • Oloughlin, Conleth
  • Wang, Yufei
  • Gao, Jinglong
  • Fourie, Andy
  • Mmbando, Erwin
Abstract

Determination of an acceptable lower bound, large strain undrained shear strength of tailings is fundamental for evaluating the stability tailings storage facilities comprising loosely deposited tailings. Currently, techniques used include laboratory shear strength testing and in-situ measurements including the cone penetration test (CPT) and vane shear test (VST). A common technique in clayey soils is to assume that CPT sleeve friction (f_s) represents the remoulded (i.e., lower bound, large strain) undrained strength of clay soil. This paper evaluates the correlation between the large strain undrained shear strength ratio obtained from f_s measurements and the value measured using constant volume ring shear tests (CVRS) using clayey iron ore tailings samples and a laboratory-standard kaolin. Slurry samples of the two materials considered were prepared in beam centrifuge strongboxes, underwent self-weight consolidation, and then were tested “in-flight” using miniature CPTs that included f_s measurement.CVRS tests were carried out on identical materials for comparison to enable an independent measurement of large strain undrained shear strength, along with slurry consolidometer tests to provide consolidation data. A comparison of the results of the CVRS and CPT sleeve measurements are then made, along with discussion on the implications of these comparisons.Potential future useful testing is suggested to elucidate these issues.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • shear test
  • iron