Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dams, Barrie

  • Google
  • 14
  • 44
  • 522

University of Bath

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (14/14 displayed)

  • 2024Fresh properties and autonomous deposition of pseudoplastic cementitious mortars for aerial additive manufacturing5citations
  • 2024Materials for aerial additive manufacturingcitations
  • 2023AERIAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING IN CONSTRUCTION USING MULTIPLE AUTONOMOUS DRONEScitations
  • 2023Development of Cementitious Mortars for Aerial Additive Manufacturing12citations
  • 2023Development and performance evaluation of fibrous pseudoplastic quaternary cement systems for aerial additive manufacturing3citations
  • 2022Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots153citations
  • 2022Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots153citations
  • 2022Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots153citations
  • 2022Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots.citations
  • 2022Integration of life cycle assessments (LCA) in circular bio-based wall panel design43citations
  • 2021Novel cementitious materials for extrusion-based 3D printingcitations
  • 2019Cement-fibre composites for additive building manufacturingcitations
  • 2018Fibrous cementitious material development for additive building manufacturing.citations
  • 2018Cementitious mortars and polyurethane foams for additive building manufacturingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kocer, Basaran Bahadir
5 / 6 shared
Ball, Richard J.
12 / 48 shared
Kovac, Mirko
5 / 6 shared
Chen, Binling
3 / 3 shared
Kaya, Yusuf Furkan
1 / 1 shared
Shepherd, Paul
13 / 19 shared
Orr, Lachlan
4 / 4 shared
Shea, Andrew
1 / 2 shared
Cascione, Valeria
1 / 1 shared
Maskell, Dan
1 / 2 shared
Emmitt, Stephen
1 / 2 shared
Allen, Stephen
1 / 3 shared
Walker, Pete
1 / 5 shared
Roberts, Matt
1 / 1 shared
Hei, Yiwei
1 / 1 shared
Amornrattanasereegul, Nattanon
1 / 1 shared
Lumlerdwit, Korntawat
1 / 1 shared
Peng, Jianan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kocer, Basaran Bahadir
  • Ball, Richard J.
  • Kovac, Mirko
  • Chen, Binling
  • Kaya, Yusuf Furkan
  • Shepherd, Paul
  • Orr, Lachlan
  • Shea, Andrew
  • Cascione, Valeria
  • Maskell, Dan
  • Emmitt, Stephen
  • Allen, Stephen
  • Walker, Pete
  • Roberts, Matt
  • Hei, Yiwei
  • Amornrattanasereegul, Nattanon
  • Lumlerdwit, Korntawat
  • Peng, Jianan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

AERIAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING IN CONSTRUCTION USING MULTIPLE AUTONOMOUS DRONES

  • Ball, Richard J.
  • Dams, Barrie
  • Shepherd, Paul
Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM), better known as ‘3D printing’ is being increasingly investigated as a method of constructing buildings using both cementitious material for structural purposes with polymer materials, typically foam, for insulation. AM offers potential advantages to construction – reduced material wastage, reduced on-site labour, increased productivity and crucially a reduction in the opportunity for accidents or fatalities on-site. However, there are challenges to overcome such as the high initial costs of materials and material development, the dimensions of the deposition printing equipment and the absence of established specialised international standards. Typically, deposition platforms involve large ground-based gantries or robotic arms, or alternatively multiple smaller coordinated grounded agents. Inherently, the dimensions of the building to be realised will be governed by the dimensions or reach capabilities of the deposition devices. An alternative approach to ground based methods is to bring an aerial capability to the AM process, releasing operations from ground-based constraints. The Aerial Additive Manufacturing (AAM) project is the world’s first project to demonstrate the feasibility of multiple self-powered untethered drones extruding material in flight to construct multiple layers of material suitable for construction. The use of drones requires the miniaturisation of the additive manufacturing process and the use of lightweight cementitious material. The deposition device consisted of a cartridge through which cementitious material was pushed. A length of tubing was required to connect the cartridge to the ultimate nozzle. The nozzle was manipulated by a stabilising delta robot attached to the base of the flying drone which minimised lateral deviation in trajectory and maintained lateral tolerances below 4mm. Extruded material was resistant to any effects of drone propellor downwash. Material development needs to consider workability – the ability of a material to pass through deposition equipment while in the fresh state, and buildability – the ability of a material to resist deformation once extruded from either self-weight or the weight of subsequently deposited layers. A structural material must also possess viable structural strength in the cured state. For AAM, material in the fresh state needs to be pseudoplastic – exhibit shear thinning behaviour – therefore reducing viscosity while the material is under stress in the deposition system and increasing by orders of magnitude once deposited to minimise deformation. Hydroxyethyl Methyl Cellulose (HEMC) and Xanthan gum were used in combination as rheology-modifying admixtures to promote pseudoplastic behaviour. Fly ash and smooth-particle sand were used to aid workability, with rounded and sub-rounded particles preferable to angular, although mixes without sand were also successfully trialled. Typical material properties of a fine aggregate-free pseudoplastic cementitious material for AAM, successfully deposited by a flying self-powered untethered drone in a programmed trajectory, were a cured compressive strength of 25 MPa, a complex modulus of 4-9 MPa within a two-hour open time, a yield stress of 1.1 KPa and material densities of approximately 1650 kg/m3. Material extrusion during autonomous flight is demonstrated with test flights in a range of trajectories through to a printed 28-layer object featuring a complex Peano curve design. The 4mm maximum lateral printing tolerances enabled by the delta robot stabilising nozzle positions are demonstrated. Fibrous reinforcement can be added as part of cementitious mixes, with both natural (banana) and synthetic (PVA, Kevlar) fibres trialled with mixes. A further issue is the acceleration of curing, which is desired to happen as soon as possible following extrusion. Further work will encompass investigation into accelerating agents and the use of Calcium Aluminate Cement to trail suitability for AAM. In conclusion, AAM brings an aerial capability to AM in construction which is envisaged to enable work in elevated or challenging site conditions, reducing the danger to human life, and promoting architectural freedom in design.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • extrusion
  • strength
  • cement
  • viscosity
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy
  • Calcium
  • cellulose
  • curing
  • material extrusion
  • complex modulus