Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Van Innis, Charline Van Innis

  • Google
  • 8
  • 6
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2024Ultra tough architected joints through single manufacturing stepcitations
  • 2024Ultra-tough architected adhesive joints for integrated composite processing and bonding6citations
  • 2023Mechanics of PEI-expoxy interfacescitations
  • 2023Fracture toughness of architected joints involving crack instabilitiescitations
  • 2023Ultra tough architected joints through single step bonding process with tunable propertiescitations
  • 2022Integrated manufacturing and toughening of composite joints using a PEI filmcitations
  • 2022Composite joint toughening by multiscale architecturing through integrated manufacturingcitations
  • 2021Bonding polymer Composites with PEI film: crack trapping and enhanced fracture resitstancecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Budzik, Michal
1 / 2 shared
Pardoen, Thomas
8 / 198 shared
Budzik, Michal Kazimierz
2 / 13 shared
Budzik, Michal K.
2 / 8 shared
Bailly, Christian
1 / 58 shared
Ballout, Wael
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Budzik, Michal
  • Pardoen, Thomas
  • Budzik, Michal Kazimierz
  • Budzik, Michal K.
  • Bailly, Christian
  • Ballout, Wael
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Integrated manufacturing and toughening of composite joints using a PEI film

  • Van Innis, Charline Van Innis
  • Pardoen, Thomas
Abstract

The intensive use of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites in aerospace is motivated by their high strength to weight ratio. However, the manufacturing of complex aeronautic structures combining metallic and composite parts requires an efficient, ideally integrated, bonding process. Bonding through classical adhesives suffer from low to moderate toughness and the process requires multiple steps separating the manufacturing of the composite parts and the bonding. (i) Objectives In order to reduce the manufacturing time of the joints, integrated manufacturing is the new target in the field. Integrated manufacturing means that composite curing and bonding are performed in a single step. Recent work of Voleppe et al. [1] focussed on the curing of an epoxy resin with a PEI film, resulting in a tough interface (880 J/m²) and crack trapping due to the development of a morphological gradient (figure 1). Hence, the current objective is to make use of this principle in the context of integrated manufacturing of tough composite joints by inserting a PEI film between the two composite adherends. (ii) Description This works aims at introducing a PEI film at composite midplane before the Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) process (figure 2a). During composite curing, the contact between epoxy resin and the PEI film allows for the development of the morphological gradient resulting in a tough interface. In order to determine the fracture toughness of these joints Double Cantilever Beam tests are performed. In addition, fractographic analyses reveal the failure mechanisms taking place in the joints in order to further improve the joint fracture toughness. (iii) Main outcomes First, it is observed that the PEI film thickness has an influence on the joint fracture toughness. However, even if the morphological gradient resulting in a high toughness in the work of Voleppe et al. develops, inserting a PEI film results in a lower fracture toughness (< 300 J/m²) than compared to composite delamination (400 J/m²). This decrease is due to the intimate contact between the carbon fibres and the PEI film. In order to create a spacing between the film and the fibres, polyethylene (PE) fishing lines are inserted (figure 2b). The influence of the spacing between the fishing lines is investigated. The lower the spacing the higher the fracture toughness due to the larger number of fishing lines acting as bridging ligaments. However, compared to thermoplastic veils the amount of thermoplastic fibres is limited, but the joint fracture toughness increases at least by a factor 2 compared to joints made of a single PEI film. Fractography also reveals that the fishing line spacing influences the failure mechanism.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • crack
  • strength
  • composite
  • resin
  • thermoplastic
  • fracture toughness
  • fractography
  • curing