Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pavanram, P.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 21
  • 847

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2021Additively Manufactured Biodegradable Porous Zinc Implants for Orthopeadic Applicationscitations
  • 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implantscitations
  • 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinc135citations
  • 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron158citations
  • 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous iron219citations
  • 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium335citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mol, Arjan
5 / 64 shared
Jahr, Holger
5 / 6 shared
Lietaert, K.
4 / 9 shared
Leeflang, M. A.
5 / 25 shared
Zhou, Jie
6 / 31 shared
Pouran, B.
5 / 11 shared
Kubo, Yusuke
1 / 1 shared
Weinans, Harrie
5 / 12 shared
Fockaert, L. I.
3 / 5 shared
Yilmaz, A.
2 / 8 shared
Zadpoor, Amir, A.
5 / 38 shared
Taheri, Peyman
1 / 16 shared
Li, Wei
1 / 6 shared
San, H.
1 / 1 shared
Paggi, U.
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, X. Y.
1 / 3 shared
Bobbert, Françoise Siu Lin
1 / 2 shared
Gonzalez-Garcia, Yaiza
1 / 27 shared
Schröder, K. U.
1 / 1 shared
Jahr, H.
1 / 2 shared
Tumer, Nazli
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mol, Arjan
  • Jahr, Holger
  • Lietaert, K.
  • Leeflang, M. A.
  • Zhou, Jie
  • Pouran, B.
  • Kubo, Yusuke
  • Weinans, Harrie
  • Fockaert, L. I.
  • Yilmaz, A.
  • Zadpoor, Amir, A.
  • Taheri, Peyman
  • Li, Wei
  • San, H.
  • Paggi, U.
  • Zhang, X. Y.
  • Bobbert, Françoise Siu Lin
  • Gonzalez-Garcia, Yaiza
  • Schröder, K. U.
  • Jahr, H.
  • Tumer, Nazli
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants

  • Yilmaz, A.
  • Zadpoor, Amir, A.
  • Mol, Arjan
  • Jahr, Holger
  • Lietaert, K.
  • Zhou, Jie
  • Pouran, B.
  • Pavanram, P.
  • Weinans, Harrie
Abstract

<p>Direct metal printed (DMP) porous iron implants possess promising mechanical and corrosion properties for various clinical application. Nevertheless, there is a requirement for better co-relation between in vitro and in vivo corrosion and biocompatibility behaviour of such biomaterials. Our present study evaluates absorption of porous iron implants under both static and dynamic conditions. Furthermore, this study characterizes their cytocompatibility using fibroblastic, osteogenic, endothelial and macrophagic cell types.</p><p>In vitro degradation was performed statically and dynamically in a custom-built set-up placed under cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2 and 20% O2) for 28 days. The morphology and composition of the degradation products were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-IT100, JEOL). Iron implants before and after immersion were imaged by μCT (Quantum FX, Perkin Elmer, USA). Biocompatibility was also evaluated under static and dynamic in vitro culture conditions using L929, MG-63, HUVEC and RAW 264.7 cell lines. According to ISO 10993, cytocompatibility was evaluated directly using live/dead staining (Live and Dead Cell Assay kit, Abcam) in dual channel fluorescent optical imaging (FOI) and additionally quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, cytotoxicity was indirectly quantified using ISO conform extracts in proliferation assays. Strut size of DMP porous iron implants was 420 microns, with a porosity of 64% ± 0.2% as measured by micro-CT. After 28 days of physiological degradation in vitro, dynamically tested samples were covered with brownish degradation products. They revealed a 5.7- fold higher weight loss than statically tested samples, without significant changes in medium pH. Mechanical properties (E = 1600–1800 MPa) of these additively manufactured implants were still within the range of the values reported for trabecular bone, even after 28 days of biodegradation. Less than 25% cytotoxicity at 85% of the investigated time points was measured with L929 cells, while MG-63 and HUVEC cells showed 75% and 60% viability, respectively, after 24 h, with a decreasing trend with longer incubations. Cytotoxicity was analysed by two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Under dynamic culture conditions, live-dead staining and flow cytometric quantification showed a 2.8-fold and 5.7-fold increase in L929 and MG-63 cell survival rates, respectively, as compared to static conditions.</p><p>Therefore, rationally designed and properly coated iron-based implants hold potential as a new generation of absorbable Orthopaedic implants.</p>

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • corrosion
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • iron
  • porosity
  • biomaterials
  • biocompatibility