People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Zadpoor, Amir, A.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (38/38 displayed)
- 2024Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printingcitations
- 2024On-Demand Magnetically-Activated Drug Delivery from Additively Manufactured Porous Bone Implants to Tackle Antibiotic-Resistant Infectionscitations
- 2024Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of extrusion-based additively manufactured porous iron–manganese scaffoldscitations
- 2024Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratiocitations
- 20244D Printing for Biomedical Applicationscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterialscitations
- 2023Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutescitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Mechanisms of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn alloy scaffoldscitations
- 2022Merging strut-based and minimal surface meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Nonlinear coarse-graining models for 3D printed multi-material biomimetic compositescitations
- 2022Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regenerationcitations
- 2022Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coating of additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffoldscitations
- 20214D printing of reconfigurable metamaterials and devices
- 2021Dynamic characterization of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials with tunable elastic propertiescitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printed biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
- 2021Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopycitations
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinccitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2020Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printingcitations
- 2019Auxeticity and stiffness of random networkscitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts through laser metal deposition (LMD)citations
- 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of metals using powder bed-based technologies
- 2019Fracture Behavior of Bio-Inspired Functionally Graded Soft–Hard Composites Made by Multi-Material 3D Printingcitations
- 2019A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymerscitations
- 2019Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesiumcitations
- 2018Multi-material 3D printed mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2017Rational design of soft mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesiumcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
Abstract
<p>Direct metal printed (DMP) porous iron implants possess promising mechanical and corrosion properties for various clinical application. Nevertheless, there is a requirement for better co-relation between in vitro and in vivo corrosion and biocompatibility behaviour of such biomaterials. Our present study evaluates absorption of porous iron implants under both static and dynamic conditions. Furthermore, this study characterizes their cytocompatibility using fibroblastic, osteogenic, endothelial and macrophagic cell types.</p><p>In vitro degradation was performed statically and dynamically in a custom-built set-up placed under cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2 and 20% O2) for 28 days. The morphology and composition of the degradation products were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-IT100, JEOL). Iron implants before and after immersion were imaged by μCT (Quantum FX, Perkin Elmer, USA). Biocompatibility was also evaluated under static and dynamic in vitro culture conditions using L929, MG-63, HUVEC and RAW 264.7 cell lines. According to ISO 10993, cytocompatibility was evaluated directly using live/dead staining (Live and Dead Cell Assay kit, Abcam) in dual channel fluorescent optical imaging (FOI) and additionally quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, cytotoxicity was indirectly quantified using ISO conform extracts in proliferation assays. Strut size of DMP porous iron implants was 420 microns, with a porosity of 64% ± 0.2% as measured by micro-CT. After 28 days of physiological degradation in vitro, dynamically tested samples were covered with brownish degradation products. They revealed a 5.7- fold higher weight loss than statically tested samples, without significant changes in medium pH. Mechanical properties (E = 1600–1800 MPa) of these additively manufactured implants were still within the range of the values reported for trabecular bone, even after 28 days of biodegradation. Less than 25% cytotoxicity at 85% of the investigated time points was measured with L929 cells, while MG-63 and HUVEC cells showed 75% and 60% viability, respectively, after 24 h, with a decreasing trend with longer incubations. Cytotoxicity was analysed by two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Under dynamic culture conditions, live-dead staining and flow cytometric quantification showed a 2.8-fold and 5.7-fold increase in L929 and MG-63 cell survival rates, respectively, as compared to static conditions.</p><p>Therefore, rationally designed and properly coated iron-based implants hold potential as a new generation of absorbable Orthopaedic implants.</p>