People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Zhou, Jie
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (31/31 displayed)
- 2024Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of extrusion-based additively manufactured porous iron–manganese scaffoldscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutescitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn alloy scaffoldscitations
- 2022Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regenerationcitations
- 2022Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coating of additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffoldscitations
- 2021Additively Manufactured Biodegradable Porous Zinc Implants for Orthopeadic Applications
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printed biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinccitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2019Modeling high temperature deformation characteristics of AA7020 aluminum alloy using substructure-based constitutive equations and mesh-free approximation methodcitations
- 2019Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesiumcitations
- 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2018A comprehensive investigation of the strengthening effects of dislocations, texture and low and high angle grain boundaries in ultrafine grained AA6063 aluminum alloycitations
- 2018Biodegradation and mechanical behavior of an advanced bioceramic-containing Mg matrix composite synthesized through in-situ solid-state oxidationcitations
- 2017Advanced bredigite-containing magnesium-matrix composites for biodegradable bone implant applicationscitations
- 2017Improvement of mechanical properties of AA6063 aluminum alloy after equal channel angular pressing by applying a two-stage solution treatmentcitations
- 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesiumcitations
- 2017Fabrication of novel magnesium-matrix composites and their mechanical properties prior to and during in vitro degradationcitations
- 2016Simultaneous improvements of the strength and ductility of fine-grained AA6063 alloy with increasing number of ECAP passescitations
- 2016An investigation on the properties of injection-molded pure iron potentially for biodegradable stent applicationcitations
- 2015Analysis of the densification behaviour of titanium/carbamide powder mixtures in the preparation of biomedical titanium scaffolds.
- 2015In vitro degradation of magnesium metal matrix composites containing bredigite
- 2015Evolution of macro- and micro-pores in the porous structures of biomedical titanium scaffolds during isothermal sintering
- 2010Preliminary investigation on creep-fatigue regime in extrusion dies
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
Abstract
<p>Direct metal printed (DMP) porous iron implants possess promising mechanical and corrosion properties for various clinical application. Nevertheless, there is a requirement for better co-relation between in vitro and in vivo corrosion and biocompatibility behaviour of such biomaterials. Our present study evaluates absorption of porous iron implants under both static and dynamic conditions. Furthermore, this study characterizes their cytocompatibility using fibroblastic, osteogenic, endothelial and macrophagic cell types.</p><p>In vitro degradation was performed statically and dynamically in a custom-built set-up placed under cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2 and 20% O2) for 28 days. The morphology and composition of the degradation products were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-IT100, JEOL). Iron implants before and after immersion were imaged by μCT (Quantum FX, Perkin Elmer, USA). Biocompatibility was also evaluated under static and dynamic in vitro culture conditions using L929, MG-63, HUVEC and RAW 264.7 cell lines. According to ISO 10993, cytocompatibility was evaluated directly using live/dead staining (Live and Dead Cell Assay kit, Abcam) in dual channel fluorescent optical imaging (FOI) and additionally quantified by flow cytometry. Furthermore, cytotoxicity was indirectly quantified using ISO conform extracts in proliferation assays. Strut size of DMP porous iron implants was 420 microns, with a porosity of 64% ± 0.2% as measured by micro-CT. After 28 days of physiological degradation in vitro, dynamically tested samples were covered with brownish degradation products. They revealed a 5.7- fold higher weight loss than statically tested samples, without significant changes in medium pH. Mechanical properties (E = 1600–1800 MPa) of these additively manufactured implants were still within the range of the values reported for trabecular bone, even after 28 days of biodegradation. Less than 25% cytotoxicity at 85% of the investigated time points was measured with L929 cells, while MG-63 and HUVEC cells showed 75% and 60% viability, respectively, after 24 h, with a decreasing trend with longer incubations. Cytotoxicity was analysed by two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Under dynamic culture conditions, live-dead staining and flow cytometric quantification showed a 2.8-fold and 5.7-fold increase in L929 and MG-63 cell survival rates, respectively, as compared to static conditions.</p><p>Therefore, rationally designed and properly coated iron-based implants hold potential as a new generation of absorbable Orthopaedic implants.</p>