Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lines, David

  • Google
  • 18
  • 39
  • 192

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (18/18 displayed)

  • 2023Single-bit coded excitation for lightweight phase coherence imagingcitations
  • 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approaches11citations
  • 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approaches11citations
  • 2023Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspectioncitations
  • 2022Towards ultrasound-driven, in-process monitoring & control of GTA welding of multi-pass welds for defect detection & preventioncitations
  • 2022Collaborative robotic wire + arc additive manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation16citations
  • 2022Investigating ultrasound wave propagation through the coupling medium and non-flat surface of wire + arc additive manufactured components inspected by a PAUT roller-probecitations
  • 2022Automated multi-modal in-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacturingcitations
  • 2022Towards real-time ultrasound driven inspection and control of GTA welding processes for high-value manufacturingcitations
  • 2022Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap weldscitations
  • 2022Targeted eddy current inspection based on ultrasonic feature guided wave screening of resistance seam weldscitations
  • 2022In-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacture components using ultrasound high-temperature dry-coupled roller-probecitations
  • 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluation16citations
  • 2022Automated real time eddy current array inspection of nuclear assets16citations
  • 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding29citations
  • 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probecitations
  • 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches19citations
  • 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defects74citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nicolson, Ewan
5 / 5 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
17 / 45 shared
Halavage, Steven
6 / 6 shared
Loukas, Charalampos
8 / 13 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
12 / 22 shared
Ding, Jialuo
8 / 39 shared
Williams, Stewart
8 / 39 shared
Rizwan, Muhammad Khalid
4 / 4 shared
Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
5 / 5 shared
Mckegney, Scott
6 / 6 shared
Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
7 / 11 shared
Foster, Euan A.
2 / 2 shared
Zimermann, Rastislav
8 / 9 shared
Fitzpatrick, Stephen
6 / 14 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
12 / 17 shared
Pierce, Stephen
12 / 51 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
3 / 4 shared
Pierce, Stephen Gareth
3 / 3 shared
Vithanage, Randika K. W.
2 / 2 shared
Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
1 / 5 shared
Parke, Simon
2 / 2 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
3 / 3 shared
Dingv, Jialuo
1 / 1 shared
Misael Pimentel, Espirindio E. Silva
1 / 1 shared
Javadi, Yashar
6 / 31 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
8 / 76 shared
Foster, Euan
3 / 8 shared
Macdonald, Charles
1 / 1 shared
Mcinnes, Martin
2 / 3 shared
Bernard, Robert
2 / 5 shared
Mcknight, Shaun
2 / 7 shared
Bolton, Gary
2 / 5 shared
Foster, Euan Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Stratoudaki, Theodosia
1 / 7 shared
Mineo, Carmelo
3 / 15 shared
Qiu, Zhen
2 / 14 shared
Pierce, Stephen G.
1 / 1 shared
Williams, Stewart W.
1 / 33 shared
Su, Riliang
2 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nicolson, Ewan
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Halavage, Steven
  • Loukas, Charalampos
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Ding, Jialuo
  • Williams, Stewart
  • Rizwan, Muhammad Khalid
  • Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
  • Mckegney, Scott
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Foster, Euan A.
  • Zimermann, Rastislav
  • Fitzpatrick, Stephen
  • Vasilev, Momchil
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Pierce, Stephen Gareth
  • Vithanage, Randika K. W.
  • Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
  • Parke, Simon
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Dingv, Jialuo
  • Misael Pimentel, Espirindio E. Silva
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Foster, Euan
  • Macdonald, Charles
  • Mcinnes, Martin
  • Bernard, Robert
  • Mcknight, Shaun
  • Bolton, Gary
  • Foster, Euan Alexander
  • Stratoudaki, Theodosia
  • Mineo, Carmelo
  • Qiu, Zhen
  • Pierce, Stephen G.
  • Williams, Stewart W.
  • Su, Riliang
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Single-bit coded excitation for lightweight phase coherence imaging

  • Lines, David
  • Nicolson, Ewan
  • Macleod, Charles N.
Abstract

The introduction of the ultrasonic phased array has inspired many advanced ultrasonic imaging techniques, through either physical beamforming or by the post-processing of Full Matrix Capture (FMC) datasets. However, post-processing methods have struggled to meet the demand for fast, lightweight imaging solutions for Non-Destructive testing (NDT). Impractical hardware and software requirements have led to the limited deployment of such techniques.<br/>Despite offering improvements in both flaw detection and characterisation, a fundamental drawback of post-processing algorithms is the increase in algorithmic complexity relative to beamformed inspection methods. TFM requires extensive focusing, and struggles to meet real-time requirements unless often expensive hardware acceleration is available. Furthermore, the volume of data required to be transferred through the imaging system is orders of magnitude larger than conventional beamforming techniques. Furthermore, the use of single-element excitation during FMC acquisition often requires high-excitation voltages to maximise acoustic energy transfer during inspection, to achieve a reliable reflection from flaws.<br/>The use of coded excitation has shown to limit the requirement for high-voltage excitation, by altering the transmission process of the phased array. Waveforms are generated using corresponding pairs of Golay codes of length 2N, which are fired successively – doubling the number of transmission events. This has shown improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of post-processing algorithms in attenuative materials, and can maintain SNR at low excitation voltages.<br/>Single-bit quantisation of FMC data has been shown to greatly reduce data transfer rates and image processing times, in particular for Phase Coherence Imaging (PCI). This has allowed reduced computational hardware requirements for data processing, with a typical 12-bit Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) being replaced by a comparator working as a single-bit ADC. <br/>By combining single-bit quantisation and coded excitation, an ultra-lightweight imaging system can be constructed with the potential to drastically reduce hardware and software requirements for post-acquisition phased array imaging. The capability of this concept has been tested using a 5 MHz array to image tip diffraction of an EDM notch in a thick carbon-steel block. By performing the required post-acquisition correlation between Golay pairs with single-bit precision, higher-order precision data has been shown to be effectively reconstructed and used to produce PCI images. Comparative studies have shown no reduction in SNR of PCI images for low-voltage excitation relative to regular high-voltage imaging processes, using a 32-cycle Golay code waveform.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • phase
  • steel
  • ultrasonic