Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Larsen, Olga Popovic

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023Secondary Timber in Structural Applicationscitations
  • 2018ReciPlyDome and ReciPlySkin bendingcitations
  • 2017ReciPlyDome_03citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Birkved, Morten
1 / 4 shared
Browne, Xan
1 / 1 shared
Andersen, Sarah C.
1 / 1 shared
Ignatavicute, Veronika
1 / 1 shared
Temmerman, Niels De
2 / 2 shared
Brancart, Stijn
2 / 4 shared
Laet, Lars De
2 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Birkved, Morten
  • Browne, Xan
  • Andersen, Sarah C.
  • Ignatavicute, Veronika
  • Temmerman, Niels De
  • Brancart, Stijn
  • Laet, Lars De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Secondary Timber in Structural Applications

  • Birkved, Morten
  • Larsen, Olga Popovic
  • Browne, Xan
  • Andersen, Sarah C.
Abstract

Currently, the cascading use of timber in Europe is minimal, with the majority of material meeting energy recovery after its first use. Secondary timber has typically been through energy intensive processes, such as drying, transportation, and sawing into rectilinear cross sections. This study with focus on structural timber re-use, aims to evaluate whether the invested embodied energy in secondary timber makes it more suited to re-use than incineration from the perspective of energy balance. <br/>A novel I beam concept, with two built prototypes, one from virgin timber, and the other from locally sourced secondary timber provide the case for comparison. The total energy required for each prototype from forest to product and waste stream to product respectively is compared, including the energy fuel value of offcut material as part of the calculation. A key parameter in this study is yield, the effectiveness of a component to utilise feedstock, a factor in which the reclaimed novel beam concept has demonstrated high performance.<br/>The study results suggest that the secondary timbers’ reduced processing demands may lead to an I beam with a lower embodied energy, posing the hypothesis that from an embodied energy aspect, re-used timber offers a more effective material utilisation than components from virgin material. This is further contextualised with other examples of cascading, such as alternative component typologies, exemplifying the important role of design in effectively utilising secondary timber. <br/>In current thinking, secondary timber poses challenges for structural applications. This project’s comparison demonstrate that the savings in energy (waste stream to product) justify the effort of overcoming these. The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings of the study, that have the potential to motivate an increased utilisation of secondary timber in high value, long term applications.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • drying