Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Heinze, Christoph

  • Google
  • 5
  • 18
  • 13

Fraunhofer Institute for Large Structures in Production Engineering IGP

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2024Creep anisotropy of additively manufactured Inconel-738LC: Combined experiments and microstructure-based modeling5citations
  • 2018Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Aerospace Structures: Highly Efficient Simulation with a Minimal Modelcitations
  • 2015Lamb Wave Propagation in Complex Geometries - A Minimal Model Approachcitations
  • 2012Characterization of mode selective actuator and sensor systems for Lamb wave excitationcitations
  • 2011Welding residual stresses depending on solid-state transformation behaviour studied by numerical and experimental methods8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Darvishi Kamachali, Reza
1 / 11 shared
Kamrani, Sepideh
1 / 11 shared
Schriever, Sina
1 / 10 shared
Manzoni, Anna
1 / 3 shared
Fedelich, Bernard
1 / 19 shared
Kianinejad, Kaveh
1 / 1 shared
Saliwan Neumann, Romeo
1 / 10 shared
Khedkar, Abhinav
1 / 1 shared
Agudo Jácome, Leonardo
1 / 34 shared
Megahed, Sandra
1 / 1 shared
Sinapius, Michael
3 / 36 shared
Wierach, Peter
3 / 44 shared
Hillger, Wolfgang
1 / 1 shared
Schmidt, Daniel
1 / 14 shared
Schwenk, Christopher
1 / 1 shared
Rethmeier, Michael
1 / 229 shared
Kromm, Arne
1 / 77 shared
Kannengießer, Thomas
1 / 126 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2018
2015
2012
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Darvishi Kamachali, Reza
  • Kamrani, Sepideh
  • Schriever, Sina
  • Manzoni, Anna
  • Fedelich, Bernard
  • Kianinejad, Kaveh
  • Saliwan Neumann, Romeo
  • Khedkar, Abhinav
  • Agudo Jácome, Leonardo
  • Megahed, Sandra
  • Sinapius, Michael
  • Wierach, Peter
  • Hillger, Wolfgang
  • Schmidt, Daniel
  • Schwenk, Christopher
  • Rethmeier, Michael
  • Kromm, Arne
  • Kannengießer, Thomas
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Aerospace Structures: Highly Efficient Simulation with a Minimal Model

  • Heinze, Christoph
  • Sinapius, Michael
  • Wierach, Peter
Abstract

Continuous monitoring of the state of a structure could provide a great benefit for many aspects of maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) of aircraft and can be an enabler for condition based maintenance. One approach to realize structural health monitoring (SHM) is based on actuator-sensor networks to excite and receive ultrasonic waves. Signal changes indicate damage, but can also be used to identify the location and type of a defect. Simulations of wave propagation could be beneficial to support development and design of SHM systems. However, currently no suitable tools exist due to the size and complexity of aerospace structures in combination with the required high frequencies. An innovative simulation technique is proposed to provide approximate solutions at selected points of the structure with drastically reduced computational cost compared to established numerical methods. In this paper an overview of this minimal model including necessary pre-processing steps is given. This is followed by a validation of the analytical approach with the help of numerical and experimental result. In a first step, wave propagation and interaction inside an aluminum plate is analyzed. Results of the proposed method are compared to calculations with the finite element method (FEM) and measurements with a laser vibrometer. Signals of all three methods agree very well and only a few minor deviations point toward some shortcomings of the minimal model in its current state. But at the same time, the huge performance advantage of the analytical model becomes apparent, as calculation are about three orders of magnitude faster as the FEM. To validate the minimal model on a more complex structure, experimental measurements on a plate consisting of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) are used. Good agreement of the results can be observed, but discrepancies are present. This is since modelling of composites is more challenging as they induce different anisotropy effects.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • simulation
  • aluminium
  • composite
  • defect
  • ultrasonic