Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Harjumäki, Riina

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Characterization of cell-biomaterial adhesion forces that influence 3D cell culturecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Huynh, Ngoc
1 / 3 shared
Teixeira Polez, Roberta
1 / 2 shared
Österberg, Monika
1 / 26 shared
Valle-Delgado, Juan José
1 / 8 shared
Pridgeon, Christopher
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Huynh, Ngoc
  • Teixeira Polez, Roberta
  • Österberg, Monika
  • Valle-Delgado, Juan José
  • Pridgeon, Christopher
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Characterization of cell-biomaterial adhesion forces that influence 3D cell culture

  • Huynh, Ngoc
  • Teixeira Polez, Roberta
  • Harjumäki, Riina
  • Österberg, Monika
  • Valle-Delgado, Juan José
  • Pridgeon, Christopher
Abstract

Biomaterials, such as cellulose, offer advantages in 3D cell culture by mimicking natural cell environments. To further optimize 3D cell culture and explore new potential materials, it is essential to gain a deeper, quantitative knowledge on cell-biomaterial and cell-cell interactions. Herein, atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based techniques, especially single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) and colloidal probe microscopy (CPM), were utilized to measure cell-cell and cell-biomaterial adhesion forces, and the results were correlated with experimental observations in 3D cell cultures. Two types of cell lines −human liver cancer cells HepG2 and human induced pluripotent stem cells iPS(IMR90)-4−, and 2 types of biomaterials −cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and Matrigel− were studied in this work. The results showed that within 72 hours, both cell types formed rounded spheroids in CNF-embedded cultures. However, when embedded in Matrigel, the cells produced aggregates with a loose, non-spheroidal morphology. Interestingly, the adhesion force and energy between individual HepG2 cells were larger than between HepG2 cells and CNF. In the case of iPS(IMR90)-4 cells, the cell-Matrigel adhesion was found to be stronger than cell-CNF and cell-cell adhesion. These findings suggest that well-defined spheroids are formed when the cell-cell adhesion is stronger than the cell-material adhesion, as is the case for 3D cell cultures in CNF hydrogels. On the contrary, cell aggregates different from spheroids are formed when the cell-material adhesion prevails over the cell-cell adhesion. Understanding these adhesion mechanisms can optimize 3D cell cultures for in vitro drug development and regulatory studies, reducing reliance on animal testing and, consequently, makingdrug screening more ethical, efficient, and relevant to human physiology. This aligns with the recent elimination of the requirement for animal testing by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in drug development.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • morphology
  • atomic force microscopy
  • cellulose
  • biomaterials