People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mohseni, Ehsan
University of Strathclyde
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (22/22 displayed)
- 20243-Dimensional residual neural architecture search for ultrasonic defect detectioncitations
- 2023Application of eddy currents for inspection of carbon fibre composites
- 2023Application of machine learning techniques for defect detection, localisation, and sizing in ultrasonic testing of carbon fibre reinforced polymers
- 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approachescitations
- 2023Mapping SEARCH capabilities to Spirit AeroSystems NDE and automation demand for composites
- 2023Using neural architecture search to discover a convolutional neural network to detect defects From volumetric ultrasonic testing data of composites
- 2023Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspection
- 2022Transfer learning for classification of experimental ultrasonic non-destructive testing images from synthetic data
- 2022Autonomous and targeted eddy current inspection from UT feature guided wave screening of resistance seam welds
- 2022Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic system
- 2022Automated bounding box annotation for NDT ultrasound defect detection
- 2022Multi-sensor electromagnetic inspection feasibility for aerospace composites surface defects
- 2022Investigating ultrasound wave propagation through the coupling medium and non-flat surface of wire + arc additive manufactured components inspected by a PAUT roller-probe
- 2022Automated multi-modal in-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacturing
- 2022Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap welds
- 2022Targeted eddy current inspection based on ultrasonic feature guided wave screening of resistance seam welds
- 2022In-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacture components using ultrasound high-temperature dry-coupled roller-probe
- 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluationcitations
- 2022Automated real time eddy current array inspection of nuclear assetscitations
- 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass weldingcitations
- 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probe
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defectscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Using neural architecture search to discover a convolutional neural network to detect defects From volumetric ultrasonic testing data of composites
Abstract
Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) are increasingly employed in both civilian and military aerospace industries due to their exceptional physical properties, such as high specific strength and corrosion resistance. However, the growing utilization of composite components necessitates extensive Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) inspections during the manufacturing process, with ultrasonic testing (UT) being the most commonly employed method. While the deployment of phased array probes can be automated using robotic inspection techniques [1], it results in the generation of substantial amounts of data. Despite advancements, the interpretation of this data remains primarily reliant on skilled operators in industrial settings. Automating this testing process poses significant challenges and the manual interpretation of data can become a major bottleneck for large-scale manufacturing. This manual interpretation process is not only time-consuming but also introduces the potential for human errors. Deep Learning methods offer an exciting possibility to help address the automated interpretation of NDT data interpretation. The scarcity of reliable training data in NDT poses significant challenges when it comes to training and testing Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. Despite this limitation, there has been a growing body of research exploring the use of DL for Ultrasonic Testing (UT) in NDT, particularly in the automated detection and characterization of defects [2]. These studies typically work with B or C scan images. The former sacrifices spatial information about the defect, while the latter retains spatial information but compresses the acoustic response data and requires manual pre-processing to remove the front and back wall responses. Unfortunately, this pre-processing step eliminates useful features, as the absence of backwall data can also lead to missed defect indications. This work presents a novel method for automated inspection of full volumetric ultrasonic data using 3D-CNNs. The method reduces the need for manual processing (such as gating) by detecting and classifying full ultrasonic volumetric data. The proposed research contributes a new technique for generating full volumetric synthetic UT data, allowing for training of a 3D-CNN with vastly reduced pre-processing. In addition, the use of domain specific augmentation methods for training which significantly increase classification performance by 22.4% are introduced. A Neural Architecture Search is performed on a ResNet based search space that was modified to account for 3D volumetric data. The resulting model showed impressive classification results when trained on augmented synthetic data and tested on data experimentally gathered from manufactured defects. The model successfully detected all back drilled hole defects, which ranged in diameter from 3 mm to 9 mm. References: [1] AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1806, no. 1, p. 020026, Feb. 2017 [2] NDT and E International, Article number. 102703, Volume 131, 20 Jul 2022