Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gascon, Nestor Calabia

  • Google
  • 3
  • 4
  • 3

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024On the Interaction between PEDOT:PSS Dispersions and Aluminium Electrodes for Solid State Electrolytic Capacitors3citations
  • 2024Effect of Impregnation of PEDOT:PSS in Etched Aluminium Electrodes on the Performance of Solid State Electrolytic Capacitorscitations
  • 2023Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD): An Alternative To Obtain Better Polymer Aluminium Electrolytic Capacitorscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wouters, Benny
2 / 13 shared
Hubin, Annick
3 / 56 shared
Terryn, Herman
3 / 124 shared
Revilla, Reynier I.
1 / 25 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wouters, Benny
  • Hubin, Annick
  • Terryn, Herman
  • Revilla, Reynier I.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD): An Alternative To Obtain Better Polymer Aluminium Electrolytic Capacitors

  • Hubin, Annick
  • Terryn, Herman
  • Gascon, Nestor Calabia
Abstract

The presence of liquid electrolytes in supercapacitors ensures an adequate ion mobility and, at the same time, good contact is achieved between porous electrodes and the electrolyte which is translated in good capacitive properties. However, liquid electrolytes limit the energy density due to their stability potential window and they can undergo undesired reactions causing either degradation or gas evolution that can lead to the disruption of the capacitor1. As a solution to overcome these issues, the liquid electrolyte can be substituted by a solid material. Conductive polymers (CPs) represent good candidates as replacements for the liquid counterparts as these can be deposited onto electrodes, present good conductive properties and can withstand higher temperatures. Among these, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) attracted most of the attention in the field for its outstanding properties2. Besides, adding different dopants allows to finetune PEDOT:PSS properties before and after the layer has been deposited3. When PEDOT:PSS is applied prepolymerized in the form of an aqueous ink onto a porous electrode to form an intimate contact, an in situ polymerization step is prevented resulting in a faster and greener production of devices. However, it has been observed that the impregnation of such electrodes is not optimal as a consequence of the increased viscosity of PEDOT:PSS water dispersions4. With the goal of obtaining optimally coated porous electrodes, an electrophoretic deposition5,6 (EPD) is proposed as a viable technique to improve the penetration of the dispersion into a porous metallic electrode, typically aluminium. Due to the charged nature of PEDOT:PSS colloids in water, thanks to the application of a bias between the porous electrode and a counter electrode, PEDOT:PSS is forced to diffuse towards the surface of the active electrode. In the present work, Aluminium/Al2O3/PEDOT:PSS systems are produced and later on analyzed via electrochemical and surface analysis techniques. The electrochemical techniques will provide information about the capacitance and the electrochemical series resistance of the stack and the surface analysis techniques will provide information about the contact between the two electrodes. The analysis of both combined will give rise to the optimal set of parameters to achieve adequate films thanks to EDP.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • porous
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • dispersion
  • surface
  • polymer
  • energy density
  • mobility
  • aluminium
  • viscosity