Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cozzi, Alex D.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 12
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Cementitious Waste Form Development for Treatment of EMF Evaporator Bottoms - 18611citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jones, Daniel H.
1 / 1 shared
Saslow, Sarah A.
1 / 2 shared
Smith, Gary L.
1 / 2 shared
Adamson, Duane J.
1 / 1 shared
Reigel, Marissa M.
1 / 1 shared
Nash, Charles A.
1 / 2 shared
Postech, Pohang
1 / 1 shared
Mccabe, Daniel J.
1 / 2 shared
Um, Wooyong
1 / 1 shared
Swanberg, David J.
1 / 2 shared
Howe, Anthony M.
1 / 1 shared
Mabrouki, Ridha
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jones, Daniel H.
  • Saslow, Sarah A.
  • Smith, Gary L.
  • Adamson, Duane J.
  • Reigel, Marissa M.
  • Nash, Charles A.
  • Postech, Pohang
  • Mccabe, Daniel J.
  • Um, Wooyong
  • Swanberg, David J.
  • Howe, Anthony M.
  • Mabrouki, Ridha
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Cementitious Waste Form Development for Treatment of EMF Evaporator Bottoms - 18611

  • Jones, Daniel H.
  • Saslow, Sarah A.
  • Smith, Gary L.
  • Adamson, Duane J.
  • Reigel, Marissa M.
  • Nash, Charles A.
  • Cozzi, Alex D.
  • Postech, Pohang
  • Mccabe, Daniel J.
  • Um, Wooyong
  • Swanberg, David J.
  • Howe, Anthony M.
  • Mabrouki, Ridha
Abstract

Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste operations at the Hanford Site (Washington State, USA) involve concentrating the Hanford low-activity waste (LAW) melter off-gas condensate waste stream by evaporation at the Effluent Management Facility (EMF) followed by recycle back to the melter feed. The EMF evaporator bottoms waste stream is expected to contain variable, high levels of halides and sulfate that could strain LAW melter performance and co-mingled radionuclides, technetium-99 ({sup 99}Tc) and iodine-129 ({sup 129}I), that readily volatilize in the LAW melter and are expected to accumulate during recycle. To this end, there is a need for alternative disposition paths for the EMF evaporator bottoms waste stream that bypass recycling to the LAW melter. One such alternative is solidification in low-temperature cementitious waste forms (CWFs) that meet disposal facility acceptance criteria. The work herein addresses recent waste form development and testing performed to identify CWF candidates that meet off-site disposal acceptance criteria and/or on-site Hanford Integrated Disposal Facility waste acceptance criteria. Phase one testing activities included the production and evaporation of simulated EMF evaporator feed from the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant melter offgas effluent liquid secondary waste stream, which was then analyzed to demonstrate the behavior and fate of contaminants of concern (COCs). Based on analyses from these preliminary tests, a simulant for the EMF evaporator bottoms waste stream was formulated and used to evaluate several dry material compositions proposed for CWF development and testing. In particular, dry ingredient recipes used in early testing efforts contained a combination of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), Class F fly ash (FA), blast furnace slag (BFS), Aquaset{sup R} II-H, and/or Aquaset{sup R} II-GH to generate CWFs at various water-to-dry material ratios. CWFs were then tested according to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for COCs, such as Cr, Zn, As, and Se, to determine which specimens comply with land disposal restrictions (40 CFR 268). The results of TCLP testing showed that chromium leaching was a persistent challenge, except when using the original Cast Stone dry ingredient recipe (8% OPC, 47% BFS, 45% FA) to immobilize the EMF evaporator bottoms simulant. Improving Cr immobilization and evaluating leaching behavior for COC Hg were identified as objectives for the second phase of testing. During second phase testing efforts, a screening test was performed to determine whether the bulk EMF waste composition is a factor in producing an acceptable solidified waste form. A series of eight simulants with varying concentrations of major salts of boron, chloride, nitrite, and sulfate were prepared and immobilized using three dry ingredient recipes. Each dry ingredient recipe contained two to three of the following: BFS, OPC, FA, and Aquaset{sup R} II-GH. All eight simulants were spiked with Zn, Cr, As, Se, and Hg prior to production of the CWFs, similar to previous tests, and used to test for residual free liquids and TCLP analysis. The TCLP results indicate that all phase two formulated CWFs meet land disposal requirements when compared to Universal Treatment Standards (40 CFR 268) for hazardous wastes, regardless of simulant composition. Furthermore, re-absorption of residual free liquids is most quickly achieved for nearly all simulant compositions using the original Cast Stone recipe; however, replicas analysis is required to corroborate these findings. (authors)

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • chromium
  • phase
  • cement
  • Boron
  • leaching
  • toxicity
  • evaporation
  • solidification
  • concentrating
  • Technetium