Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sinz, Wolfgang

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2019Development Of A Certification Procedure For Numerical Pedestrian Modelscitations
  • 2016Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulationscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ratingen, Michiel Van
2 / 2 shared
Ellway, James
1 / 1 shared
Schneider, Bernd
1 / 1 shared
Feist, Florian
2 / 14 shared
Klug, Corina
2 / 4 shared
Raffler, Marco
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ratingen, Michiel Van
  • Ellway, James
  • Schneider, Bernd
  • Feist, Florian
  • Klug, Corina
  • Raffler, Marco
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations

  • Raffler, Marco
  • Ratingen, Michiel Van
  • Sinz, Wolfgang
  • Feist, Florian
  • Klug, Corina
Abstract

For the Euro NCAP pedestrian protection assessment of vehicles with deployable systems numerical simulations using Human Body Models (HBMs) have to be carried out.<br/>Within the project CoHerent a procedure is developed to provide evidence that differing HBMs show comparable and reproducible results in terms of kinematics. The methodology is independent of the FE solver, independent of the HBM, reproducible and in accordance with boundary conditions of Euro NCAP pedestrian protocol. <br/>Four representative generic vehicle models were developed to simulate pedestrian impacts. The models represent the current European fleet in terms of geometry and stiffness. Boundary condition for the HBM like initial position and anatomic landmarks for post processing are defined. The robustness of the procedure is proved by results of a sensitivity study using THUMS version 4 and the simplified GHBM pedestrian model. <br/>The procedure is applied on state of the art human body models to develop corridors for trajectories. New or updated versions of HBMs have to be compared to the developed corridors to prove if their kinematics are comparable to other HBMs and therefore are applicable for Euro NCAP assessment. <br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation