Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nicolson, Ewan

  • Google
  • 5
  • 15
  • 16

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2023Single-bit coded excitation for lightweight phase coherence imagingcitations
  • 2023Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspectioncitations
  • 2022Towards real-time ultrasound driven inspection and control of GTA welding processes for high-value manufacturingcitations
  • 2022Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap weldscitations
  • 2022Automated real time eddy current array inspection of nuclear assets16citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lines, David
5 / 18 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
5 / 45 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
3 / 22 shared
Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
1 / 5 shared
Pierce, Stephen
4 / 51 shared
Parke, Simon
1 / 2 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
1 / 3 shared
Foster, Euan Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Loukas, Charalampos
1 / 13 shared
Mcinnes, Martin
1 / 3 shared
Mcknight, Shaun
1 / 7 shared
Bolton, Gary
1 / 5 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
1 / 76 shared
Bernard, Robert
1 / 5 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
1 / 17 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lines, David
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Parke, Simon
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Foster, Euan Alexander
  • Loukas, Charalampos
  • Mcinnes, Martin
  • Mcknight, Shaun
  • Bolton, Gary
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Bernard, Robert
  • Vasilev, Momchil
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspection

  • Lines, David
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Nicolson, Ewan
  • Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

Post-manufacturing weld inspection processes within the oil, gas and nuclear industries are crucial in ensuring the integrity of critical components. Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) utilising Ultrasonic Phased Array Testing (PAUT) techniques are currently preferred to perform post-welding inspections, enabling correction of potential flaws before components are used in the field. <br/>However, this process can be refined to increase manufacturing efficiency and reduce production costs while maintaining quality assurance. The marriage of the welding and inspection processes, widely termed ‘In-Process Inspection’, allows potential flaws to be detected, analysed, and corrected if necessary, between individual weld passes. Not only does this increase throughput by combining two separate processes, but also reduces the rework and disruption experienced by current practices. The feasibility of the in-process technique has been successfully shown using high-temperature ultrasonic wheel probes for standard V-groove welds. Despite this, the technique has not yet been applied to other welding practices, such as narrow-gap. <br/>Narrow-gap welds are typically chosen to reduce required weld volume and heat input to manufacture thick-section components, such as pressure vessels, modular reactors and gas storage tanks. Notoriously difficult to consistently inspect, narrow-gap weld inspection methods would greatly benefit from an in-process technique. This would allow flaws in initial passes to be detected early, and reduce the requirement to excavate large volumes of deposited weld material to correct. <br/>Despite the obvious advantages, an in-process method introduces added challenges for ultrasonic inspection, particularly due to effects observed from added geometric reflections from partial weld geometries, industrial process interference, and high temperature gradients. Furthermore, an inspection plan which optimises probe position to maximises acoustic energy for inspection of each pass as it is deposited would be crucial. <br/>A dual-tandem inspection method has been proposed to ensure consistent detection of simulated Lack-of-Sidewall Fusion (LOSWF) defects in mock narrow-gap weld samples. This includes two opposite-facing phased array probes on each side of the weld, to ensure uniform coverage from each weld side, and to improve system sensitivity to diffractive effects. Near-vertical 5.0 mm x 1.0 mm EDM notches in 120.0 mm thick Carbon Steel mock weld samples have been detected and sized using a dual-aperture Full Matrix Capture (FMC) data acquisition and Multi-Mode Total Focussing Method (MMTFM) algorithm. <br/>Using a path-finding Time-of-Flight (ToF) calculation algorithm, this method has also been shown to successfully adapt to partial weld inspection through geometric compensation, with detection and sizing of EDM notches in mock partial narrow gap samples. Through data fusion techniques, vertical notch detection and characterisation is greatly enhanced relative to traditional phased array methods. <br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • steel
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy
  • defect
  • ultrasonic