Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ijaz, M.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Association of IL-17A promoter region SNP-rs2275913 with urinary bladder cancer.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ayub, H.
1 / 2 shared
Shb, Ali
1 / 2 shared
Anwar, M.
1 / 4 shared
Ejaz, M.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ayub, H.
  • Shb, Ali
  • Anwar, M.
  • Ejaz, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Association of IL-17A promoter region SNP-rs2275913 with urinary bladder cancer.

  • Ijaz, M.
  • Ayub, H.
  • Shb, Ali
  • Anwar, M.
  • Ejaz, M.
Abstract

<h4>Objective</h4>Urinary bladder cancer (UBC) is the fourth most common cancer among men and tenth most common cancer in women. This study investigated an association of interleukins -17A promoter region single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-rs2275913 with UBC in Pakistani population.<h4>Methods</h4>Population-based study was designed with 127 UBC patients and 100 healthy individuals. Only UBC Patients were included and other diseases hepatitis or any other malignancy/cancer were excluded from the study. Polymerase chain reaction Restriction fragment length polymorphism technique was used to genotype the rs2275913 SNP in patients and control. Linear regression analysis was performed on the genotype data and allelic frequency data. Online statistical tool was used to calculate ratio of odds.<h4>Results</h4>Linear regression analysis showed that there was no association between rs2275913 SNP and UBC patients in the dominant model (OR = 0.815, CI = 0.415-1.6), recessive model (OR = 0.389, CI = 0.014-5.565), codominant model (OR = 0.376, CI=0.013-5.420) and (OR = 0.855, CI = 0.427-1.713). Moreover, among the UBC samples, low-grade non-muscle invasive UBC samples dominant model (OR = 0.722, CI = 0.316-1.637), recessive model (OR = 0.000, CI = 0.000-5.864), codominant model (OR = 0.864, CI = 0.030-12.668), and (OR = 0.788, CI = 0.341-1.806) did also not show any association. When same analysis was performed for high-grade muscle invasive UBC, dominant (OR = 0.936, CI = 0.403-2.155), recessive model (OR = 0.875, CI = 0.031-12.696), and codominant model (OR = 0.864, CI = 0.030-12.668,), and (OR = 0.942, CI = 0.394-2.232) did not show any association.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Results revealed that rs2275913 did not show any associated with the high risk of UBC in Pakistani population. Some limitations of the studies are firstly, the samples size and other are detailed information on UBC and role of inflammation.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • chemical ionisation