Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Saeed, Hasan

  • Google
  • 8
  • 8
  • 9

Ghent University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2024Experimental evaluation of the short and long fatigue crack growth rate of S355 structural steel offshore monopile weldments in air and synthetic seawater1citations
  • 2023Stress intensity factor calculation for short cracks initiating from a semi-ellipsoidal pitcitations
  • 2023Stress intensity factor calculation for short cracks initiating from a semi-ellipsoidal pitcitations
  • 2023Thermometric investigation of fatigue crack initiation from corrosion pits in structural steel used in offshore wind turbinescitations
  • 2022Calibration and validation of extended back-face strain compliance for a wide range of crack lengths in SENB-4P specimens4citations
  • 2022Calibration and validation of extended back-face strain compliance for a wide range of crack lengths in SENB-4P specimens4citations
  • 2022Test methods for corrosion-fatigue of offshore structurescitations
  • 2022Test methods for corrosion-fatigue of offshore structurescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
De Waele, Wim
5 / 78 shared
Chaudhuri, Somsubhro
6 / 27 shared
Vancoillie, Robin
2 / 2 shared
Hectors, Kris
2 / 8 shared
Mehri Sofiani, Farid
3 / 21 shared
Waele, Wim De
3 / 30 shared
De Coster, Robbe
1 / 1 shared
Elahi, Seyed Ahmad
1 / 19 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • De Waele, Wim
  • Chaudhuri, Somsubhro
  • Vancoillie, Robin
  • Hectors, Kris
  • Mehri Sofiani, Farid
  • Waele, Wim De
  • De Coster, Robbe
  • Elahi, Seyed Ahmad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Stress intensity factor calculation for short cracks initiating from a semi-ellipsoidal pit

  • Vancoillie, Robin
  • Hectors, Kris
  • Saeed, Hasan
  • Mehri Sofiani, Farid
  • Waele, Wim De
Abstract

Offshore wind turbine support structures are exposed to maritime conditions, which can lead to corrosion fatigue. This work is part of the FATCOR project funded by the Belgian Energy Transition Fund, aiming to develop a qualitative and quantitative understanding of the mechanisms of corrosion fatigue in seawater. Localized corrosion generates a geometrical defect, raising the local stresses and reducing the fatigue life. The transition from pit growth to short fatigue crack propagation occurs at a critical pit size, which depends upon the microstructure, the applied stress level and the geometry of the pit. In linear elastic fracture mechanics, the stress intensity factor is used to describe the magnitude of the stress singularity near a crack tip caused by remote stresses and is useful for establishing a failure criterion. Literature lacks stress intensity factor solutions for cracks emanating from a three-dimensional semi-ellipsoidal pit. Fig. 1 (a) shows a schematic representation of a plate subjected to axial tensile stress with a semi-ellipsoidal pit at the center of the top surface. Two cracks in the shape of a circular arc are introduced at the pit mouth perpendicular to the loading direction (see Fig. 1 (b)). Finite element analysis is used to calculate the stress intensity factor (K₁) at the crack tip (see Fig. 2). The displacement extrapolation method is used to quantify the effect of different pit configurations and crack lengths on K₁. This method determines K₁ from the displacement field near the crack tip. A parametric study is performed on a range of relative geometrical parameter values (a/2c, b/c) and crack lengths (r/a). It is observed that changes in the pit geometry can drastically affect the stress gradient in the vicinity of the pit, which directly influences the magnitude of K₁. For example, (a/2c) equal to 1, 0.5 and 0.25, resulting in K₁ values of 74.4, 71.1 and 56.6 MPa√mm respectively, for a remote stress of 100 MPa. In future work, regression analysis will be performed to develop an equation to calculate the K₁ for a wide range of pit configurations and crack lengths.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • crack
  • fatigue
  • finite element analysis