People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Belnoue, Jonathan P.-H.
University of Bristol
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (35/35 displayed)
- 2024An accurate forming model for capturing the nonlinear material behaviour of multilayered binder-stabilised fabrics and predicting fibre wrinklingcitations
- 2024That’s how the preform crumples: Wrinkle creation during forming of thick binder-stabilised stacks of non-crimp fabricscitations
- 2024Virtual data-driven optimisation for zero defect composites manufacturecitations
- 2024Parametric study on the effect of material properties, tool geometry, and tolerances on preform quality in wind turbine blade manufacturingcitations
- 2024Process models: A cornerstone to composites 4.0citations
- 2024But how can I optimise my high-dimensional problem with only very little data? – A composite manufacturing applicationcitations
- 2023A comprehensive modelling framework for defect prediction in automated fibre placement of composites
- 2023Thickness Control of Autoclave-Molded Composite Laminatescitations
- 2022Intelligent Composites Forming - Simulations For Faster, Higher Quality Manufacture
- 2022A MODELLING FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF PREPREG TACK UNDER PROCESSING CONDITIONS
- 2022Understanding tack behaviour during prepreg-based composites’ processingcitations
- 2021On the physical relevance of power law-based equations to describe the compaction behaviour of resin infused fibrous materialscitations
- 2021Consolidation-driven wrinkling in carbon/epoxy woven fabric prepregscitations
- 2021Compaction behaviour of continuous fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites under rapid processing conditionscitations
- 2021Modelling compaction behavior of toughened prepreg during automated fibre placement
- 2021Lab-based in-situ micro-CT observation of gaps in prepreg laminates during consolidation and curecitations
- 2021Hypo-viscoelastic modelling of in-plane shear in UD thermoset prepregscitations
- 2020Predicting consolidation-induced wrinkles and their effects on composites structural performancecitations
- 2020Experimental characterisation of the in-plane shear behaviour of UD thermoset prepregs under processing conditionscitations
- 2020A rapid multi-scale design tool for the prediction of wrinkle defect formation in composite componentscitations
- 2019Modelling of the in-plane shear behavior of uncured thermoset prepreg
- 2019A numerical study of variability in the manufacturing process of thick composite partscitations
- 2019Machine-driven experimentation for solving challenging consolidation problems
- 2019Mitigating forming defects by local modification of dry preformscitations
- 2018Modelling process induced deformations in 0/90 non-crimp fabrics at the meso-scalecitations
- 2018Experimental Characterisation of In-plane Shear Behaviour of Uncured Thermoset Prepregs
- 2018Multi-scale modelling of non-uniform consolidation of uncured toughened unidirectional prepregscitations
- 2016Predicting wrinkle formation in components manufactured from toughened UD prepreg
- 2016Understanding and prediction of fibre waviness defect generation
- 2016Cohesive/Adhesive failure interaction in ductile adhesive joints Part Icitations
- 2016An experimental investigation of the consolidation behaviour of uncured prepregs under processing conditionscitations
- 2015The compaction behaviour of un-cured prepregs
- 2012A numerical model for thick composite-metallic adhesive joints
- 2011Adaptive calibration of a nonlocal coupled damage plasticity model for aluminium alloy AA6082 T0
- 2007Modeling crack initiation and propagation in nickel base superalloys
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
conferencepaper
Intelligent Composites Forming - Simulations For Faster, Higher Quality Manufacture
Abstract
In the field of composites, infusion techniques are a cheaper manufacturing alternative to autoclave moulding of prepreg. However, the latter is often the favoured manufacturing route in the aerospace sector as it allows for the production of better quality parts (in this industry passenger safety is paramount). One of the challenges with infusion techniques is the high deformability of the dry fibrous precursor material, which makes it susceptibly to defects and part variability. In particular, prior to the infusion phase, the dry fibrous reinforcement, is formed to shape; the quality of the final part is sensitive to both variabilities in materials and the forming process itself. If the material and process (including their variabilities) are not understood or controlled, this can result in design tolerances not being met, reducing composites weight saving advantages through requiring "over design".<br/><br/>In the last two decades, FE-based methods have been developed to help optimise process conditions for the best part quality. However, these require large number of explicit iterations because of significant dynamic and non-linear behaviour, making them very time-consuming especially for complex models. The design space and the number of process parameters that can be optimised can be quite large (e.g. bagging material, boundary conditions etc) making the optimisation process computationally intensive. Therefore, an intelligent strategy must be used to design these simulation tests and conduct optimisation with the computational cost as low as possible.<br/><br/>In the present contribution, FE simulations of a forming process of an industrial inspired geometry are conducted based on forming simulation tools developed at the University of Bristol [1-2] to produce a small dataset required to build an emulator for process optimisation. The simulations consider four tensioning springs attached at the boundaries of the textile material to provide tensile force during forming process (see the figure), of which the positions and stiffnesses are variables. A Gaussian process emulator (surrogate model) is then built [3-5] to model and optimise these variabilities. Gaussian emulators excel in situations where only small datasets are available. They also have the added benefit of uncertainty quantification, thus no manipulations are required for inclusion of variability. This work will present the methodology for building such emulators for optimisation of composite manufacturing simulation, including the possibility to improve emulator performance through sequential design. The long term ambition of this work, is to build a fully autonomous forming rig with embedded sensors and active controls where the manufacturing conditions are adapted on the fly and defect formation mitigated based on rich, live experimental data feeding into real-time simulation and optimization of the process.<br/>