Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sadeghi, Negin

  • Google
  • 3
  • 5
  • 3

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023A real-world data-driven lifetime assessment of a WTG support structurecitations
  • 2022Fatigue Analysis on Four Months of Data on a Steel Railway Bridge: Event Detection and Train Features’ Effect on Fatigue Damage3citations
  • 2020Towards A Comprehensive Fatigue And Crack Propagation Toolbox For Offshore Wind Foundationscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Weijtjens, Wout
3 / 4 shared
Noppe, Nymfa
3 / 3 shared
Robbelein, Robbelein
1 / 1 shared
Devriendt, Christof
3 / 5 shared
Weil, Maximillian
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Weijtjens, Wout
  • Noppe, Nymfa
  • Robbelein, Robbelein
  • Devriendt, Christof
  • Weil, Maximillian
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A real-world data-driven lifetime assessment of a WTG support structure

  • Weijtjens, Wout
  • Sadeghi, Negin
  • Noppe, Nymfa
  • Robbelein, Robbelein
  • Devriendt, Christof
Abstract

With several offshore wind farms (OWF) in Europe entering the second half of their design<br/>lifetime, the offshore wind industry is increasing its focus on the period beyond the intended<br/>design life. This study focusses on an alternative to decommissioning beyond the certified<br/>operational period: extension the lifetime of the assets. In this context, the domains of lifecycle engineering and structural health monitoring (SHM) are increasingly gaining attention.<br/>However, to date, there is no consensus in the offshore wind industry on the methodology to<br/>perform such assessments. [1]<br/>The fatigue limit state (FLS) is often the main driver for designing wind turbine generator<br/>(WTG) support structures. Earlier work with real-world SHM data indicated that the<br/>consumed fatigue life is less than expected during design phase. [2]<br/>This poster presents a case study of a data-driven FLS assessment of a specific primary steel<br/>weld based on more than 5 years of real-world SHM and SCADA (Supervisory Control And<br/>Data Acquisition) data. The data-driven methodology is such that there is no need to perform<br/>aero-elastic load simulations. The potential for lifetime extension is identified by assessing<br/>the accumulated fatigue damage for theoretical and modified modelling scenarios.<br/>The study included validation of the some key principles in the data-driven assessment and<br/>the general industry consensus that the as-is environmental and operational conditions (EOC)<br/>are favourable compared to the earlier, theoretical, considerations.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • simulation
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • steel
  • fatigue