People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Girardin, François
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (13/13 displayed)
- 2018Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approachcitations
- 2018Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approachcitations
- 2017Investigation of the performance of the MQL, dry, and wet turning by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN)citations
- 2017Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of Polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability functioncitations
- 2017Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of Polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability functioncitations
- 2017Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methodscitations
- 2017Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methodscitations
- 2017Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: A response surface methodology approach
- 2017Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: A response surface methodology approachcitations
- 2016Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning processcitations
- 2016Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning processcitations
- 2015Modeling and optimization of tool wear and surface roughness in turning of austenitic stainless steel using response surface methodology
- 2015Modeling and optimization of tool wear and surface roughness in turning of austenitic stainless steel using response surface methodology
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Modeling and optimization of tool wear and surface roughness in turning of austenitic stainless steel using response surface methodology
Abstract
The wear of cutting tools remains a major obstacle. The effects of wear are not only antagonistic at the lifespan and productivity, but also harmful with the surface quality. The present work deals with some machinability studies on ?ank wear, surface roughness, and lifespan in ?nish turning of AISI304 stainless steel using multilayerTi(C,N)/Al2O3/TiN coated carbide inserts. The machining experiments are conducted based on the response surface methodology (RSM). Combined effects of three cutting parameters, namely cutting speed, feed rate and cutting time on the two performance outputs (i.e. VB and Ra), and combined effects of two cutting parameters, namely cutting speed and feed rate on lifespan (T), are explored employing the analysis of variance (ANOVA).The relationship between the variables and the technological parameters is determined using a quadratic regression model and optimal cutting conditions for each performance level are established. The results show that the flank wear is influenced principally by the cutting time and in the second level by the cutting speed. In addition, it is indicated that the cutting time is the dominant factor affecting workpiece surface roughness followed by feed rate, while lifespan is influenced by cutting speed.