Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Snowdon, Alexandra A.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag7citations
  • 2023Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated dragcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Longyear, Jennifer E.
1 / 1 shared
Stoodley, Paul
1 / 12 shared
Wharton, Julian A.
1 / 27 shared
Dennington, Simon P.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Longyear, Jennifer E.
  • Stoodley, Paul
  • Wharton, Julian A.
  • Dennington, Simon P.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

thesis

Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated drag

  • Snowdon, Alexandra A.
Abstract

Marine biofilms cause a significant increase in drag on ships. From the current literature it is understood that physical and mechanical (physico-mechanical) properties of biofilms influence drag, yet it remains understudied. In part, this is explicable by biofilm heterogeneity and adaptability which complicate efforts to link biofilm properties to frictional drag. As a result, rigid and homogeneous structures are typically used as the benchmark for studying biofilm-associated drag, but as they neglect natural biofilm behaviour, such as viscoelasticity, they could be causing underestimations in drag predictions. To improve drag predictions there is a need to better understand biofilm fluid-structure interactions and the role these play in drag production. In the current work, it was shown that mesoscopic structural properties: thickness, coverage, and roughness, of marine biofilms interact with viscoelasticity and therefore implicate drag. This relationship was reported using a meso-scale flow cell with an integrated pressure drop system in conjunction with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) which enabled deformation behaviour to be captured in-situ in real-time whilst simultaneously measuring drag (expressed as a friction coefficient). To build on rigid conventional models, a material sandpaper system with a tailored mechanical profile and surface roughness was proposed. The results showed that, over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104, an elastomeric sandpaper system caused up to a 52 % higher drag and produced a different drag curve when compared to rigid alternatives of equivalent roughness; differences were attributed to differences in the mechanical response to increasing shear. Similar drag curves were also found for marine biofilms grown at Hartlepool Marina (UK) under hydrodynamic conditions and using OCT it was revealed that viscoelastic behaviour (such as deformation and streamer behaviour) was, in part, responsible for the deviation from rigid drag trends. From the experimental model, and from marine biofilm testing, it was concluded that viscoelasticity plays a critical role in drag production, displays a relationship with structural properties and should not be neglected when estimating biofilm-associated drag by using rigid rough models. Marine biofilms grow on different surfaces, for example on different coatings, or under varying hydrodynamic conditions which likely alter biofilm physico-mechanics and implicate drag.<br/>Despite this, marine biofilm viscoelasticity has not been previously quantified in the literature. Here, marine biofilms were cultivated across different surfaces in-field and were rheologically characterised using a parallel-plate rheometer. An OCT was utilised to capture biofilm structure and to further investigate links between biofilm structure and mechanics under different conditions. This Thesis confirmed that marine biofilms are viscoelastic, with a shear modulus ranging from 11 Pa to 7500 Pa depending on growth conditions. For example, biofilms grown under a low flow velocity were softer, thinner, experienced greater structural disruption and produced a 5.7 % higher drag (over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104) than biofilms grown under a higher flow. In this work it has been emphasised how marine biofilms exhibit dynamic physico-mechanical behaviour when exposed to shear and how elastomeric materials could be better suited for mimicking biofilm-associated drag. The results presented offer insight into the complex and dynamic interactions between biofilm properties and how different surface or growth conditions can alter these relationships. In the long term, this data could be used to improve estimations of biofilm-associated drag and support the development of future marine coatings for targeting drag-producing properties, such as viscoelasticity.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • tomography
  • viscoelasticity