People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Antusch, S.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (28/28 displayed)
- 2024Microstructural changes induced in advanced tungsten grades under high temperature neutron irradiation
- 2024Microstructure of additive manufactured materials for plasma-facing components of future fusion reactorscitations
- 2022Recent progress in the assessment of irradiation effects for in-vessel fusion materials: tungsten and copper alloyscitations
- 2021Fabrication routes for advanced first wall design alternatives
- 2021Fabrication routes for advanced first wall design alternativescitations
- 2020Fracture behavior of tungsten-based composites exposed to steady-state/transient hydrogen plasmacitations
- 2020Fracture behavior of tungsten-based composites exposed to steady-state/transient hydrogen plasma
- 2020Fracture behavior of tungsten-based composites exposed to steady-state/transient hydrogen plasmacitations
- 2020Development of a brazing procedure to join W-2Y2O3 and W-1TiC PIMmaterials to Eurofecitations
- 2019Manufacturing, high heat flux testing and post mortem analyses of a W-PIM mock-upcitations
- 2019High pulse number thermal shock testing of tungsten alloys produced by powder injection moldingcitations
- 2017Recrystallization and composition dependent thermal fatigue response of different tungsten gradescitations
- 2017Plasma exposure of tungsten in the linear plasma device PSI-2 produced via powder injection molding
- 2017Characterization of Powder Injection Molded and Spark Plasma Sintered Tungsten Materials as Plasma Facing Materials for DEMO
- 2016Materials for DEMO and reactor applications-boundary conditions and new concepts
- 2015Mechanical and microstructural investigations of tungsten and doped tungsten materials produced via powder injection moldingcitations
- 2014Rapid material development and processing of complex shaped parts via tungsten powder injection molding
- 2014Microstructural anisotropy of ferritic ODS alloys after different production routes
- 2014Two component tungsten powder injection molding - An effective mass production process
- 2013Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in Europecitations
- 2013Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in Europecitations
- 2013One- and two-component tungsten powder injection molding for manufacturing fusion reactor devices
- 2013Processing of tungsten and tungsten alloys by powder injection moulding for fusion energy applications
- 2013Mass production and joining via multicomponent tungsten powder injection molding
- 2012One- and two-component tungsten powder injection molding for manufacturing fusion reactor devices
- 2012Two component tungsten powder injection molding - an effective mass production process
- 2012Two component tungsten powder injection molding for mass production of the He-cooled DEMO divertor parts
- 2011Two component tungsten powder injection molding for mass production of the He-cooled DEMO divertor parts
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Plasma exposure of tungsten in the linear plasma device PSI-2 produced via powder injection molding
Abstract
Tungsten is envisaged as plasma facing material in fusion reactors because of its small tritium retention and low erosion rate as well as its high melting point and high thermal conductivity. However, it is very hard and brittle, which makes it difficult and expensive to fabricate and prone to crack formation under transient heat loads. The first disadvantage can be ameliorated using Powder Injection Molding (PIM) as fabrication route . With its near-net-shape precision the method offers particularly the advantage of cost saving. Furthermore PIM is an ideal tool for scientific investigations andefficient production of new oxide and carbide doped materials. In this contribution, we report on the initial exposure of pure tungsten produced via PIM (sintered at 2400 °C, density 98,6 - 99%, with equiaxed grain orientation) in the linear plasma device PSI-2usingdeuterium and neon plasmas (to enhance physical sputtering) with a moderate plasma flux density of 4x10 21 m-2s-1 to the targets. For the neon plasma exposure, the targets were biased to obtain an ion impact energy of 110 eV and the fluence was 1.6x10 25 m-2, for deuterium to 200 eV at a fluence of 5.2x10 25 m-2, respectively. The sample temperature has been kept to 150 – 200°C during these exposures. In addition, the samples have been exposed to transient heat loads by a Nd:YAG- laser to simulate ELM-likeheat pulses of 0.38 GWm-2 and a duration of 1 ms with a frequency of 0.5 Hz. 1000 pulses have been applied with and without plasma exposure. Reference samples (Plansee W, density > 99.97%, rolled, with a grain elongation perpendicular to the loaded surface and W with density > 99.95%, rolled, grain elongation parallel to the loaded surface) were exposed under the same conditions for comparison. Net erosion has been measured by determination of the mass loss, the surface roughness by laser profilometry and the resulting fuel inventory has been determined by nuclear reaction analysis. The surface morphology has been analyzed prior and after the exposure by secondary electron microscopy. We observe in all cases a slightly enhanced erosion yield of the PIM material to about 10-20%, the response of the material to the transient heat loads is similar in terms of roughness and surface morphology with a larger damage during neon exposure compared to deuterium exposure. The most significant difference between PIM and reference material is observed for the fuel retention which was about a factor of 5 larger for the exposed PIM samples (determined by NRA). A modest porosity observed for the PIM samples could be a possible explanation of this finding.