Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Unterberg, B.

  • Google
  • 4
  • 31
  • 107

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2017Plasma-wall interaction studies within the EUROfusion consortium: progress on plasma-facing components development and qualification107citations
  • 2017Plasma–wall interaction studies within the EUROfusion consortium: progress on plasma-facing components development and qualificationcitations
  • 2017Plasma exposure of tungsten in the linear plasma device PSI-2 produced via powder injection moldingcitations
  • 2016Materials for DEMO and reactor applications-boundary conditions and new conceptscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wirtz, M.
3 / 21 shared
Rasinski, M.
4 / 10 shared
Kreter, A.
3 / 4 shared
Coenen, J. W.
3 / 16 shared
Möller, S.
2 / 4 shared
Rieth, Michael
1 / 58 shared
Bähner, J. P.
1 / 1 shared
Antusch, S.
2 / 28 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wirtz, M.
  • Rasinski, M.
  • Kreter, A.
  • Coenen, J. W.
  • Möller, S.
  • Rieth, Michael
  • Bähner, J. P.
  • Antusch, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Plasma exposure of tungsten in the linear plasma device PSI-2 produced via powder injection molding

  • Rieth, Michael
  • Möller, S.
  • Unterberg, B.
  • Bähner, J. P.
  • Rasinski, M.
  • Coenen, J. W.
  • Wirtz, M.
  • Antusch, S.
  • Kreter, A.
Abstract

Tungsten is envisaged as plasma facing material in fusion reactors because of its small tritium retention and low erosion rate as well as its high melting point and high thermal conductivity. However, it is very hard and brittle, which makes it difficult and expensive to fabricate and prone to crack formation under transient heat loads. The first disadvantage can be ameliorated using Powder Injection Molding (PIM) as fabrication route . With its near-net-shape precision the method offers particularly the advantage of cost saving. Furthermore PIM is an ideal tool for scientific investigations andefficient production of new oxide and carbide doped materials. In this contribution, we report on the initial exposure of pure tungsten produced via PIM (sintered at 2400 °C, density 98,6 - 99%, with equiaxed grain orientation) in the linear plasma device PSI-2usingdeuterium and neon plasmas (to enhance physical sputtering) with a moderate plasma flux density of 4x10 21 m-2s-1 to the targets. For the neon plasma exposure, the targets were biased to obtain an ion impact energy of 110 eV and the fluence was 1.6x10 25 m-2, for deuterium to 200 eV at a fluence of 5.2x10 25 m-2, respectively. The sample temperature has been kept to 150 – 200°C during these exposures. In addition, the samples have been exposed to transient heat loads by a Nd:YAG- laser to simulate ELM-likeheat pulses of 0.38 GWm-2 and a duration of 1 ms with a frequency of 0.5 Hz. 1000 pulses have been applied with and without plasma exposure. Reference samples (Plansee W, density > 99.97%, rolled, with a grain elongation perpendicular to the loaded surface and W with density > 99.95%, rolled, grain elongation parallel to the loaded surface) were exposed under the same conditions for comparison. Net erosion has been measured by determination of the mass loss, the surface roughness by laser profilometry and the resulting fuel inventory has been determined by nuclear reaction analysis. The surface morphology has been analyzed prior and after the exposure by secondary electron microscopy. We observe in all cases a slightly enhanced erosion yield of the PIM material to about 10-20%, the response of the material to the transient heat loads is similar in terms of roughness and surface morphology with a larger damage during neon exposure compared to deuterium exposure. The most significant difference between PIM and reference material is observed for the fuel retention which was about a factor of 5 larger for the exposed PIM samples (determined by NRA). A modest porosity observed for the PIM samples could be a possible explanation of this finding.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • morphology
  • surface
  • grain
  • crack
  • carbide
  • mass spectrometry
  • electron microscopy
  • porosity
  • injection molding
  • tungsten
  • thermal conductivity
  • profilometry