Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Meghoe

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

University of Twente

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Towards the development of a hybrid methodology of head checks in railway infrastructurecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tinga, Tiedo
1 / 28 shared
Loendersloot, Richard
1 / 53 shared
Jamshidi, A.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tinga, Tiedo
  • Loendersloot, Richard
  • Jamshidi, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Towards the development of a hybrid methodology of head checks in railway infrastructure

  • Tinga, Tiedo
  • Loendersloot, Richard
  • Meghoe
  • Jamshidi, A.
Abstract

In this paper, the first step towards the development of a hybrid methodology for the monitoring of head checks is discussed. The proposed hybrid method combines a data driven approach with physical modelling of the rail in order to obtain an early stage warning for head checks. Rail defect detection at an early stage of the growth can be challenging and the existence of the seed defects can be confused with non-defect objects on the rail. Thus, a physical model is proposed to investigate how head checks, in particular in curved tracks, initiate and evolve. Track characteristics and loading, e.g. track geometry and track tonnage, are considered to analyze crack initiation by using the Whole Life Rail Model (WLRM) for Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF) relying on meta-models. The results of the physical modelling and the rail defect observations obtained from the data analysis on the eddy current (EC) measurements are then compared. The physics based model only suggests whether a crack will be initiated or not, it does not give information about the size of the crack. Hence, the next step is to develop an evolution model from the EC and Ultrasonic (US) measurements data, from which the crack size can be determined. This combination of physics based and data-driven evolution model is thus regarded as the hybrid method. This hybrid method can be a robust tool for the prediction of rail condition, as it eases the visualization of the rail degradation and keeps infrastructure managers informed of the actual rail condition that can be confirmed with rail inspections. Finally, real-life measurements from a track in the Dutch railway network are used to show the (potential) benefits of the proposed methodology.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • fatigue
  • ultrasonic