Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Harik, Ramy

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Thin-plycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yokan, Catherine
1 / 2 shared
Jegley, Dawn
1 / 1 shared
Lovejoy, Andrew
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yokan, Catherine
  • Jegley, Dawn
  • Lovejoy, Andrew
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Thin-ply

  • Yokan, Catherine
  • Jegley, Dawn
  • Harik, Ramy
  • Lovejoy, Andrew
Abstract

<p>Highly repeatable and nearly defect-free fabrication of composite parts is critical to the success and widespread acceptance of composite materials. Through optimization using thin-ply materials, composite parts can be manufactured to be lighter and tailored more specifically to anticipated design loads than with standard prepreg materials alone. However, defects arising from the thin-ply manufacturing process are not always similar to defects found with standard tows. These new defects warrant evaluation. At NASA Langley Research Center, the manufacturing process parameters associated with automated fiber placement (AFP), a slit tape-based composite manufacturing process, were optimized for the use of a thin-ply prepreg carbon-epoxy material. Carbon-epoxy tows with areal weights of 30 g/m<sup>2</sup>and 70 g/m<sup>2</sup>were used in these manufacturing trials. The AFP process parameters of heater output, compaction force, tow feed rate, and tow tension were adjusted and optimized for successful manufacturing. This article documents an exploration of thin-ply fabrication on both flat and complex-shaped surfaces. Ultimately, aerospace-quality laminates were made from the 70-g/m<sup>2</sup>material, but imperfections in the 30-g/m<sup>2</sup>material itself and the fact that the AFP machine was not designed for such a thin material meant that more research and trials are required to obtain flight-quality 30-g/m<sup>2</sup>laminates.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • composite
  • defect