Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kirichek, Alex

  • Google
  • 18
  • 27
  • 244

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (18/18 displayed)

  • 2024Sailing through fluid mudcitations
  • 2022Tuning the rheological properties of kaolin suspensions using biopolymers11citations
  • 2022Estimating P-and S-Wave Velocities in Fluid Mud Using Seismic Interferometry4citations
  • 2022Rheology of Flocculated Suspension in Turbidity Currentscitations
  • 2022Effects of organic matter degradation in cohesive sediment9citations
  • 2022From fundamentals to implementation of yield stress for nautical bottom : case study of the Port of Hamburg4citations
  • 2022Why do settling and yield stress of mud differ in european ports?citations
  • 2022From fundamentals to implementation of yield stress for nautical bottom: Case study of the Port of Hamburg4citations
  • 2021Rheology of Mud5citations
  • 2021Laboratory seismic measurements for layer-specific description of fluid mud and for linking seismic velocities to rheological properties3citations
  • 2021Advances in Maintenance of Ports and Waterways: Water Injection Dredging9citations
  • 2020Using in situ density and strength measurements for sediment maintenance in ports and waterways20citations
  • 2020Yield stress measurements of mud sediments using different rheological methods and geometries46citations
  • 2020Yield stress measurements of mud sediments using different rheological methods and geometries: An evidence of two-step yielding46citations
  • 2019Water Injection Dredging and Fluid Mud Trapping Pilot in the Port of Rotterdamcitations
  • 2019Is density enough to predict the rheology of natural sediments?29citations
  • 2019Rheological analysis of mud from Port of Hamburg, Germany49citations
  • 2017Dielectric spectroscopy of granular material in an electrolytesolution of any ionic strength5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lovato, S.
1 / 2 shared
Brummelhuis, E. Ten
1 / 1 shared
Rockx, S.
1 / 1 shared
Ohle, N.
1 / 1 shared
Hupkes, E.
1 / 1 shared
Chassagne, Claire
12 / 12 shared
Shakeel, Ahmad
12 / 16 shared
Ali, Waqas
1 / 1 shared
Heller, Karel
1 / 1 shared
Draganov, Deyan
2 / 3 shared
Ma, Xu
1 / 2 shared
Helmons, Rudy
1 / 1 shared
Ali, W.
1 / 7 shared
Enthoven, D. H. B.
1 / 1 shared
Gebert, Julia
2 / 2 shared
Zander, Florian
1 / 1 shared
Bornholdt, Jasper
2 / 2 shared
Ohle, Nino
2 / 2 shared
Heller, H. K. J.
1 / 1 shared
Ma, X.
1 / 15 shared
Kessel, Thijs Van
1 / 1 shared
Cronin, K.
1 / 2 shared
Wit, Lynyrd De
1 / 1 shared
Chassagne, C.
1 / 2 shared
Shakeel, A.
1 / 11 shared
Rutgers, Ronald
1 / 1 shared
Ghose, Ranajit
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lovato, S.
  • Brummelhuis, E. Ten
  • Rockx, S.
  • Ohle, N.
  • Hupkes, E.
  • Chassagne, Claire
  • Shakeel, Ahmad
  • Ali, Waqas
  • Heller, Karel
  • Draganov, Deyan
  • Ma, Xu
  • Helmons, Rudy
  • Ali, W.
  • Enthoven, D. H. B.
  • Gebert, Julia
  • Zander, Florian
  • Bornholdt, Jasper
  • Ohle, Nino
  • Heller, H. K. J.
  • Ma, X.
  • Kessel, Thijs Van
  • Cronin, K.
  • Wit, Lynyrd De
  • Chassagne, C.
  • Shakeel, A.
  • Rutgers, Ronald
  • Ghose, Ranajit
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Water Injection Dredging and Fluid Mud Trapping Pilot in the Port of Rotterdam

  • Kirichek, Alex
  • Rutgers, Ronald
Abstract

As conventional dredging and relocation of sediment deposits is highly expensive, port authorities seek for more efficient solutions for reducing the costs of maintenance dredging. One of the well-known solutions is water injection dredging (WID). In general, WID is proven to be cheaper than the hopper dredging by leaving the sediment in place, thus, eliminating substantial costs for relocation of the dredged sediment.<br/><br/>In autumn 2018, the utility of WID and fluid mud trapping was investigated in the Port of Rotterdam. As a first step, the sediment trap was made in the Calandkanaal. Next, the WID actions were carried out for fluidization of the top layer sediment around the deepening and horizontal transport of the fluidized mud into the sediment trap. The WID actions were monitored by means of multi-beam and single-beam echo-sounding surveying methods at low (15-38 kHz) and high frequencies (200-400 kHz). After WID has taken place, the sediment trap was regularly surveyed for 3 months. Apart of abovementioned echo-sounding surveying methods, different penetrometers were used for monitoring the settling and consolidation processes in the sediment trap. We used Graviprobe, Rheotune and DensX for measuring the shear strength, the yield stress and the density of sediment, respectively. These measurements were compared to the ones in laboratory, where the densities and the yield stresses of sediment samples were measured independently.<br/><br/>It was concluded that the water injection dredging method can be efficiently used for fluidizing and transporting weak fluid mud layers. In-situ measuring tools are available for characterizing the behavior of fluidized sediment. Based on our experimental investigation, it can be concluded that new cost-effective port maintenance strategy is feasible in the port.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength