Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nicolson, Ewan

  • Google
  • 5
  • 15
  • 16

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2023Single-bit coded excitation for lightweight phase coherence imagingcitations
  • 2023Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspectioncitations
  • 2022Towards real-time ultrasound driven inspection and control of GTA welding processes for high-value manufacturingcitations
  • 2022Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap weldscitations
  • 2022Automated real time eddy current array inspection of nuclear assets16citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lines, David
5 / 18 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
5 / 45 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
3 / 22 shared
Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
1 / 5 shared
Pierce, Stephen
4 / 51 shared
Parke, Simon
1 / 2 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
1 / 3 shared
Foster, Euan Alexander
1 / 1 shared
Loukas, Charalampos
1 / 13 shared
Mcinnes, Martin
1 / 3 shared
Mcknight, Shaun
1 / 7 shared
Bolton, Gary
1 / 5 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
1 / 76 shared
Bernard, Robert
1 / 5 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
1 / 17 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lines, David
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Tant, Katherine Margaret Mary
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Parke, Simon
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Foster, Euan Alexander
  • Loukas, Charalampos
  • Mcinnes, Martin
  • Mcknight, Shaun
  • Bolton, Gary
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Bernard, Robert
  • Vasilev, Momchil
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap welds

  • Lines, David
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Nicolson, Ewan
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

When considering narrow-gap welding processes, common in the nuclear industry, wherein the weld angle is in the range of 2° – 10°, lack-of-fusion defects can appear at near-vertical angles. Traditional single-probe phased array weld inspection, operated in pulse-echo mode, have shown a relatively low sensitivity to vertical and near-vertical planar defects. This is largely due to the dependency of pulse-echo inspection on defect orientation for a favourable reflection angle. Using a single-probe setup may not provide suitable assurances for detection of such defects as the majority of sound energy is reflected away from the transducer by the defect. Multi-mode self-tandem inspection has been used to improve sensitivity to defects of this type, but this method still relies on reflection orientation from the defect. Furthermore, in the case of narrow gap welding, material thicknesses are often large in the hundreds of mm’s and a growing number of required skips can greatly increase ray paths, and in turn attenuation effects.<br/>To overcome the aforementioned traditional phased array inspection challenges,introducing a second opposite facing phased array probe on the far side of the weld to perform simultaneous through-transmission and pulse-echo inspection was investigated. The addition of through-transmission acquisition allows for enhanced detection capability enabled by the combined indications obtained from defect reflections and diffraction effects. For near-vertical defects, this will allow responses from tip-diffraction to be included, in addition to body reflections obtained from pulse-echo. Moreover, Full Matric Capture (FMC) acquisition was deployed to obtain four distinct sub-datasets - one for each of the two pulse-echo and two through-transmission acquisitions performed.<br/>In addition, the added adaptability of the inspection system due to the inclusion of a second probe, including mode choice, probe separation and wedge considerations was investigated through numerical simulations and experiments. One such wedge consideration is the balance between beamforming and transmissibility for shear and longitudinal modes. Longitudinal waves exhibit greater diffraction effects, and are therefore the desirable mode choice for through-transmission. Conversely, shear wave modes provide better resolution and amplitude, so are desirable for pulse-echo. It is therefore advantageous to maximise the transmission of each of these modes without completely limiting the other. Analysis of different wedge angles was conducted and a conclusion drawn from the results of an optimal wedge angle for aluminium of ~20°. This is closer to a standard longitudinal wedge angle to avoid the first critical angle, which is typically surpassed by standard shear wedge angles of ~35°.<br/>It has been shown using ray-tracing simulations that using a combined pulse-echo and through-transmission setup can produce high SNR TFM images of vertical and near-vertical defects. Care must be taken in choosing the correct modes for each FMC sub-dataset, so as to maximise defect detection sensitivity. Data fusion techniques can also be applied for multi-mode and multi-view imaging, further increasing available image parameters. Initial multi-view data fusion tests have shown tip diffraction TFM imaging with a SNR up to 36dB.<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • inclusion
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • aluminium