Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Parke, Simon

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Towards ultrasound-driven, in-process monitoring & control of GTA welding of multi-pass welds for defect detection & preventioncitations
  • 2022Towards real-time ultrasound driven inspection and control of GTA welding processes for high-value manufacturingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lines, David
2 / 18 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
2 / 3 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
2 / 45 shared
Pierce, Stephen
2 / 51 shared
Nicolson, Ewan
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lines, David
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Nicolson, Ewan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Towards ultrasound-driven, in-process monitoring & control of GTA welding of multi-pass welds for defect detection & prevention

  • Parke, Simon
  • Lines, David
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

Many industrial sectors, such as nuclear and defence, employ ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) as a means of ensuring the strength and safety of welded components both before they reach service and throughout their service-life. Often these welded components are composed of thick sections, which necessitate the need for high-integrity welding processes and the use of a multiple pass weld deposition strategy. Traditionally, ultrasonic inspection takes place only after the deposition of all weld runs which means that defects introduced in early weld runs can remain buried until the final inspection. This greatly complicates the re-work procedure, resulting in increased material wastage, part scrappage and associated costs. <br/>In recent years, there have been increasing industrial and economic drivers to reduce manufacturing costs, especially as the nuclear sector is being called upon to play a significant role in the delivery of low-carbon energy production in the future. The application of innovative in-process inspection and control strategies is one way the NDT sector can strive to support the achievement of this aim. In-process monitoring and inspection of welding processes make it possible to detect the formation of defects at the earliest possible point to enable quicker and more cost effective correction and repair.<br/>As the most critical weld run within any multi-pass weld is the root pass, it is vital that this be monitored precisely to ensure integrity of the welded joint. Here, traditional phased array ultrasonic approaches are used to interrogate and analyse the molten weld pool during robotic deposition of a Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) root pass of a common multi-pass weld joint (90 degree included bevel angle, 1.5mm root face height and 2.5mm root gap). Through processing and analysis of the received shear and longitudinal ultrasonic waves, this technique is shown to be capable of screening root pass width and height, whilst also critically indicating lack of root penetration (LORP). This capability directly informs in-process inspection and monitoring with the potential for closed-loop control and the opportunity to correct for any defects as they are formed. The potential for utilising a similar strategy for upper passes within multi-pass welds is discussed with reference to the challenges encountered during discrimination of the solid lower and molten upper passes.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy
  • defect
  • ultrasonic
  • tungsten