Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Qi, Xiubin

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023The challenges to implement extensive in situ water quality sensor networkscitations
  • 2023The challenges to implement extensive in situ water quality sensor networkscitations
  • 2010The Effect of Water Uptake on the Response of a Polymer Based QCM Sensor for Hydrocarbonscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Macleod, Adam
2 / 3 shared
Sanders, Tarun
2 / 2 shared
Akther, Asma
1 / 1 shared
Crooke, Emma
1 / 2 shared
Hill, Anita
1 / 8 shared
Myers, Matt
1 / 6 shared
Ross, Andrew
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Macleod, Adam
  • Sanders, Tarun
  • Akther, Asma
  • Crooke, Emma
  • Hill, Anita
  • Myers, Matt
  • Ross, Andrew
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

The challenges to implement extensive in situ water quality sensor networks

  • Akther, Asma
  • Macleod, Adam
  • Qi, Xiubin
  • Sanders, Tarun
Abstract

To better meet the challenge of managing our freshwater resources from pressures such as population growth, extreme events, climate change and industry impacts, we require a step change in monitoring and forecasting capabilities to provide management-ready information at scale across wider geographical areas. To meet the resource challenges we face, we should exploit diverse and integrated approaches, from traditional sampling, in situ sensors,satellite observations and advanced modelling.The AquaWatch Australia Mission,proposes such a step change in monitoring technologies to support the scales and speeds at which models now operate and to safeguard water bodies.The concept proposes an integrated nationwide ground-to-space national monitoring platform incorporating satellite and in situ sensor observations together with a dedicated data analysis platform to address stakeholders needs.Key characteristics required for a nationwide in situ water quality monitoring sensor network include: a) cost-effectiveness to both construct and operate; b) maintainability, and; c) timely, robust and credible data to integrate with other data sources to address decision making needs. An Internet of Things (IoT) solution is perhaps seen as the most cost-effective approach to deliver ubiquitous and autonomous sensing across wide spatial and temporal scales, but to date the research only highlights localised examples. Similarly, reliable and cheap water quality sensors suitable for IoT adoption remain largely in the research domain. New sensors will also need to be innovatively and robustly constructed for IoT systems characterised by resource constraints: in communication capabilities, energy, processing capabilities and limited data storage.The paper will and address the challenges we face in: 1) the development of nationwide water quality networks for improved management of freshwater resources. 2) the new thinking required to cost-effectively address water quality parameter detection and, 3) the challenge to integrate and analyse real-time data generated from a highly distributed and heterogenous sensor networks.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy