Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Grooteman, Frank

  • Google
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Impact Damage Identification on Composite Structurescitations
  • 2022Dynamics-based impact identification method for composite structurescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Loendersloot, Richard
2 / 53 shared
Marinho, Natália
2 / 4 shared
Tinga, Tiedo
1 / 28 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Loendersloot, Richard
  • Marinho, Natália
  • Tinga, Tiedo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Dynamics-based impact identification method for composite structures

  • Tinga, Tiedo
  • Loendersloot, Richard
  • Grooteman, Frank
  • Marinho, Natália
Abstract

Modern aircraft design acknowledges integrity, superior strength-to-weight ratio, and safety as critical priorities, which has led to the development of monitoring and maintenance techniques for composite structures. However, composite materials pose the risk of introducing damage that cannot be identified visually, namely barely visible impact damage (BVID). If not detected and repaired in time, damage to the structure can compromise its performance and integrity. Therefore, structural health monitoring (SHM) is an emerging technology that can enhance BVID detection in composite structures. Using ultrasonic waves to locate and characterize an impacted region in composite materials is one of the most promising SHM techniques for quantitative impact identification. Although previous studies use guided waves to assess impact in composite materials, few have addressed inservice inspection, and still, few have attempted to quantify impact severity information from the measured signals to full-scale engineering structures. The present investigation addresses these challenges by developing measures of impact identification based on features extracted from ultrasonic waves. Hence, the research aims to develop a monitoring method using combined sensing technologies to gather data from the system and then translate it into predictions about its health. It requires research across multiple disciplines, such as signal processing, data analysis, damage modeling, dynamics, and sensing technologies. This work proposes to combine the building block (B.B.) approach and the design of experiments (DOE) for guided wave-based structural health monitoring (GWSHM). This practical and systematic approach minimizes the number of tests needed for realistic and large structures by building data from lower-level to higher-level systems. Researchers have conducted lowenergy impact tests on a square (1x1m) aluminum and composite plates in the current research phase. Several sensor signal features and the effect of signal response for various energy levels have been examined using the impact response data generated from three different sensor types: Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG), Piezoelectric Patch Transducer (PZT), and Optical Acoustic Emission (OptimAE). Therefore, the present work compares the performance and reliability of FBGs and OptimAE sensors using PZT-based sensors as a reference. In addition, this study describes a systematic experimental approach and analyzes preliminary results over a range of energy levels<br/>below the damage onset. The results showed that the distance from sensors and the directivity effect (for FBG) affect the sensitivity and signal strength. Furthermore, considering the requirements of SHM sensors, the performance also varies with different sensing technologies. In the next stage, SHM analysis will address the effect of structural elements with added complexity (i.e., stiffeners and variable thickness).

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • experiment
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • composite
  • impact test
  • ultrasonic
  • acoustic emission
  • impact response