Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Khalilabad, Mahdi Masoumi

  • Google
  • 3
  • 3
  • 89

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2022Effect of heat treatments on microstructural and mechanical characteristics of dissimilar friction stir welded 2198/2024 aluminum alloys30citations
  • 2018Effect of tool geometry and welding speed on mechanical properties of dissimilar AA2198–AA2024 FSWed joint59citations
  • 2016The Influence of Tool Geometry on Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded AA-2024 and AA-2198 Jointscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jahazi, Mohammad
3 / 17 shared
Bocher, Philippe
3 / 22 shared
Zedan, Yasser
3 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jahazi, Mohammad
  • Bocher, Philippe
  • Zedan, Yasser
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

The Influence of Tool Geometry on Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded AA-2024 and AA-2198 Joints

  • Jahazi, Mohammad
  • Bocher, Philippe
  • Zedan, Yasser
  • Khalilabad, Mahdi Masoumi
Abstract

The tool geometry in friction stir welding (FSW) is a critical parameter to produce reliable and consistent joints, especially when it comes to joining dissimilar alloys with different mechanical and thermal properties. The aim of the present work is to investigate the effect of FSW tool design on the mechanical characteristic of as-welded AA2198(T3)-AA2024(T3) joints. Three shoulder profiles (flat, spiral, and fan) and five different pin profiles (tapered cylindrical, straight cylindrical, threaded cylindrical, cone and square) were tested. A visual inspection and metallographic characterization were conducted to evaluate the sound state of the joint. Tensile tests and scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to assess the mechanical properties of the different joints in regard to fractographic analyses and local chemical composition. Significant flash was produced for flat shoulder configurations. FSW tools with fan or with spiral shoulders prevent the formation of the flash defect. Lack of penetration (LOP) and kissing bond defects were avoided by tapering the tip of the pin with a diameter greater than or equal to the plate thickness. The tapered cylindrical pin with a fan shoulder was the optimal tool design configuration for mechanical properties.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • chemical composition
  • defect
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • joining