Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rocha, Iuri

  • Google
  • 10
  • 11
  • 359

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (10/10 displayed)

  • 2024Physically recurrent neural network for rate and path-dependent heterogeneous materials in a finite strain framework3citations
  • 2023Machine learning of evolving physics-based material models for multiscale solid mechanics19citations
  • 2023Physically recurrent neural networks for path-dependent heterogeneous materials39citations
  • 2022Neural networks meet physics-based material modelscitations
  • 2020Micromechanics-based surrogate models for the response of composites58citations
  • 2019A combined experimental/numerical investigation on hygrothermal aging of fiber-reinforced composites46citations
  • 2019Interpreting the single fiber fragmentation test with numerical simulations13citations
  • 2019Efficient micromechanical analysis of fiber-reinforced composites subjected to cyclic loading through time homogenization and reduced-order modeling20citations
  • 2017Hygrothermal ageing behaviour of a glass/epoxy composite used in wind turbine blades122citations
  • 2017Combined experimental/numerical investigation of directional moisture diffusion in glass/epoxy composites39citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kovačević, Dragan
1 / 4 shared
Maia, M. A.
2 / 2 shared
Kerfriden, P.
3 / 5 shared
Maia, M. Alves
1 / 1 shared
Raijmaekers, S.
3 / 9 shared
Lahuerta, F.
1 / 4 shared
Mikkelsen, L. P.
1 / 7 shared
Sluys, Bert
4 / 27 shared
Nijssen, R. P. L.
3 / 8 shared
Raijmaekers, Sibrand
1 / 1 shared
Fischer, H. R.
1 / 30 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kovačević, Dragan
  • Maia, M. A.
  • Kerfriden, P.
  • Maia, M. Alves
  • Raijmaekers, S.
  • Lahuerta, F.
  • Mikkelsen, L. P.
  • Sluys, Bert
  • Nijssen, R. P. L.
  • Raijmaekers, Sibrand
  • Fischer, H. R.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Neural networks meet physics-based material models

  • Rocha, Iuri
  • Maia, M. Alves
Abstract

In a concurrent (FE2) multiscale modeling is an increasingly popular approach for modeling complex materials. As such, it is especially suited for modeling composites, as their complex microstructure can be explicitly modeled and nested to each integration point of the macroscale. However, this generality is often associated with exceedingly high computational costs for real-scale applications. One way to tackle the issue is to employ a cheaper-to-evaluate surrogate model for the microstructure based on few observations of the high-fidelity solution. On this note, Neural Networks (NN) are by far the most popular technique in building constitutive surrogates. However, conventional NNs assume a unique mapping between strains and stresses, limiting their ability to reproduce path-dependent behavior. Moreover, their data-driven nature severely limits their ability to extrapolate away from their training spaces. To circumvent these drawbacks, the alternative explored in this work is to reintroduce some of the physics-based knowledge of the problem into the NN. This is done by employing actual material models used in the full-order micromodel as the activation function of one of the layers of the network. Thus, path-dependency arises naturally since every material model in the layer has its own internal variables. To assess its capabilities, the network is employed as the surrogate model for a composite Representative Volume Element with elastic fibers and elasto-plastic matrix material. First, for a single micromodel, the performance of the network is compared to that of a state-of-the-art Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) in a number of challenging scenarios for data-driven models. Then, the proposed framework is applied to an FE2 example and the results are compared to the full-order solution in terms of accuracy and computational cost. An important outcome of the physics-infused network is the ability to naturally predict unloading/reloading behavior without ever seeing it during training, a stark contrast with highly popular but data-hungry models such as RNN.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • polymer
  • composite
  • activation