Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bhangale, Jaykarna

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022How literature reviews influence the selection of fatigue analysis frameworkcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Benedictus, Rinze
1 / 27 shared
Bersee, H. E. N.
1 / 7 shared
Alderliesten, René
1 / 44 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Bersee, H. E. N.
  • Alderliesten, René
OrganizationsLocationPeople

conferencepaper

How literature reviews influence the selection of fatigue analysis framework

  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Bersee, H. E. N.
  • Alderliesten, René
  • Bhangale, Jaykarna
Abstract

Prediction models for fatigue in engineering applications are developed within a fatigue analysis framework, deliberately selected in some cases, but mostly chosen without substantiation. The proposition of this paper is that selecting the most appropriate framework can only be done with the knowledge and a complete overview of existing frameworks and their systematic categorization. In particular for composite materials, where due to coexistence of different mechanisms and their complex interaction under fatigue loading, only a unified approach can characterize the complete fatigue phenomenon. To that aid, this paper provides a complete overview of existing fatigue analysis frameworks for various materials along with such systematic categorization. Each analysis framework is based on a specific methodology that evolved over time. Hence, this overview is provided following the time stamp evolution of each methodology within different analysis frameworks. With such an overview, one can conclude that for fatigue analysis of composite materials, the theory of the thermodynamics of the irreversible processes and continuum damage mechanics framework provides the required unified approach. Additionally, this paper demonstrates that many material classes, like metals and composites, can be analysed using a common framework. This common framework has similarity up to a certain level, and at the detailed level, it differs by addressing the difference in material class-specific mechanisms. ; Structural Integrity & Composites

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • theory
  • fatigue
  • composite