Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Laurent, Fabien

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Using the blocking effect of the foam for remediation of high permeability contaminated aquiferscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Aranda, Romain
1 / 1 shared
Bertin, Henri
1 / 2 shared
Davarzani, Hossein
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Aranda, Romain
  • Bertin, Henri
  • Davarzani, Hossein
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Using the blocking effect of the foam for remediation of high permeability contaminated aquifers

  • Laurent, Fabien
  • Aranda, Romain
  • Bertin, Henri
  • Davarzani, Hossein
Abstract

Using the blocking effect of the foam for remediation of high permeability contaminated aquifers Liquid foam has been studied as a blocking agent in porous media, especially for Enhanced Oil Recovery applications. The goal of foam injection is to block high-permeability layers in the media in order to reach the oil in low-permeability layers. This technique can also be used for remediation. However, contrary to oil industry, soils are non-consolidated porous media with high permeability as well as low pressure and temperature operational conditions. Foams can also be used to desorb pollutant thanks to the low surface tension of surfactant or push the pollutant to a recovery well thanks to foam high viscosity. In both cases, the benefits of using foam instead of monophasic surfactant solution is to create a homogeneous high viscous fluid that limits fingering. In this study, we assume that groundwater velocity is too high (10 m/day) to use conventional in situ remediation techniques like oxidation/reduction because of short contact time. That is why the main goal is to create a foam barrier upstream to temporarily divert the groundwater flow away from the treatment area downstream. While the pollution is isolated from the groundwater flow, other techniques can be used to actually remediate more efficiently the polluted aquifer. Moreover, the pilot polluted aquifer soil is heterogeneous with a very high hydraulic conductivity (10-4-10-2 m/s). Two different experimental setups were used to obtain the results. The first one is composed of a column of sand or glass beads, instrumented with pressure sensors to monitor the pressure gradient during foam flow. Mass balance was also conducted to measure the water saturation in the column. The second one is composed of a thin 1 m large and 50 cm high tank to model a 2D flow. The tank is instrumented with pressure and water saturation sensors. In addition, an imaging technique is used to measure the evolution of foam volumes, streamlines and water saturations. During the experiments, foam is injected from the bottom of the tank and water is injected from left to right to model a groundwater flow. Finally, the experimental results are compared with numerical models in order to validate them. The validated model can be then used to simulate foam injection for field scale studies. The surfactant has been chosen based on low toxicity, foamability and foam stability tests. Then, thanks to the column experiments, a specific behavior of foam in high permeable porous media was identified with two successive different regimes of foam flow ("weak" and "strong" foam) as well as necessary injection conditions for its generation. Finally, the influence of injection parameters on the foam blocking properties, such as the "Resistance Factor", the residual water saturation, the radius of influence or the stability under a groundwater flow, has been investigated. The parameters studied are the injection method (gas and surfactant co-injection, Surfactant-Alternating-Foam (SAF), foam pre-generation), the flow rates, and the foam quality. The results show the applicability of this technique and its limits for a field usage.

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • glass
  • glass
  • viscosity
  • permeability
  • toxicity
  • surfactant